My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2018 09 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2018 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2018 09 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:26:37 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:56:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/13/2018
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 13, 2018 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />have solicited public comment through events, online comments, and an open house. <br />Public outreach will continue throughout the process. <br />Libhart described the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) process, which included a draft <br />of the plan itself, feedback from the community, and a schedule to complete the plan. <br />She described the Plan as a blueprint to help guide discussions and funding <br />opportunities for projects serving all modes of transportation in and out of the City. Part <br />of the Plan also addresses policies and programs for implementation. In preparation, <br />TEI has reviewed previous projects in the City and developed goals and community <br />needs based on that research and on community feedback. TEI is aiming for Council <br />adoption of the plan in May 2019. The goal for the preliminary meeting before the <br />Commission was to get commissioners' input on the material. <br />Libhart noted that previous plans for the City have outlined transportation -adjacent <br />projects or have treated different modes of transportation in different plans. The TMP <br />will be the first plan that treats transportation in the city overall as the principal issue. <br />Also, previous plans have lacked measurements for success and enactment and <br />enforcement methods. <br />The draft goals for the new plan are as follows: <br />(1) Provide more choices for community access and connectivity to destinations <br />(2) Develop great streets that prioritize transportation options <br />(3) Enhance safety and travel reliability within the transportation network <br />(4) Support regional connections for residents, employees, and visitors <br />(5) Implement programs that enhance mobility <br />(6) Support development of walkable places <br />Moline asked for the definition of the acronyms NAMS and RTP. <br />Libhart replied that NAMS was the Northwest Area Mobility Study, which is a plan for <br />transit in the area developed with RTD, and RTP was the Regional Transportation Plan <br />by DRCOG. <br />Libhart presented an overview of the Plan. Louisville has experienced recent growth <br />and is expected to continue growing in residential population and even more in <br />population of employees. The areas near McCaslin, on South Boulder Road, and at the <br />CTC, for example, will likely see the most growth. To address this projected growth, the <br />plan identified the main corridors for commuters in and out of Louisville. Today, 70% of <br />commuters drive alone and 6% of commuters take public transit, 2% bike, 2% walk, and <br />13% telework. For all trips, 30% are three miles or shorter. Trips shorter than 3 miles <br />are often accessible for people to use modes of transportations other than cars, so the <br />Plan treats those trips as opportunities to make those other modes more accessible. <br />Libhart stated that Louisville had a lot of pedestrian walkways and lots of sidewalks. The <br />Plan identified three high -density zones for pedestrians, or "walk sheds." A map of the <br />walk sheds showed that the sheds often end in transitional zones between downtown <br />areas and nearby neighborhoods, meaning that people may not feel that the downtowns <br />and the residential areas are well -integrated and accessible. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.