Planning Commission Minutes 2014 06 10

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 12, 2014 Page 5of7 maintaining them if necessary. Public Works requests a better definition with the applicant of what maintenance involves. o There is 15% public land dedication requirement. Previously, the land was zoned commercial which requires 12% dedication. There is a 3% discrepancy that the applicant would need to meet. The Parks Department has accepted a suggestion of payment in lieu instead of land dedication. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of Lanterns Final PUD: Resolution No. 8, Series 2014 with one condition. Commission Questions of Staff. Moline asks whether this development is part of Summit View or Takoda? Robinson answers that it originally was part of Summit View subdivision, then re -platted part of the Takoda subdivision, and now is being re -platted again. Applicant Presentation: Justin McClure, RMCS, Inc., 950 Spruce Street, Suite 2A, Louisville, CO. Also present is David Wolner, RMCS, Inc. and David Gregg, Boulder Creek Builders, 712 Main Street, Louisville, CO. No formal presentation with one additional rendering. There has been essentially no change between what was approved preliminarily and now for final. They are in support of the one condition on the resolution; on sheet 8 of PUD, note 6, there is an annotation to maintain the sidewalks to city standards. They will continue the discussion with the Planning Department as well as Public Works. Submits material board, motion entered by Rice, seconded by O'Connell, passed by voice vote. Commission Questions of Applicant: Moline asks about the Davidson Highline Ditch. This project will pipe it. What is the first location this ditch gets to daylight? McClure answers that at the extension of Kaylix, there is a temporary rip -rap condition until Kaylix Avenue is extended over the ditch. Moline asks about the ditch extending west. McClure answers the ditch extending to the railroad tracks was piped during the Steel Ranch improvements. Moline asks about the trees associated with the ditch on City open space? McClure answers the cottonwoods associated with the easement are at the discretion of the ditch company. Typically, the decision to pipe the ditch is synonymous with elimination of the trees. Public Comment: None. Summary and request by Staff and Applicant: Staff states this complies with the GDP and applicable guidelines and recommends approval. Closed Public Hearing and discussion by Commission: Rice is in favor. O'Connell is in support with the suggested condition.