Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 25, 2020 <br />Page 15 of 24 <br />o Case Manager: Lisa Ritchie, Senior Planner <br />Staff Presentation: <br />Before staff begins their presentation, Ritchie verifies that this application's public notice <br />requirements have been met. They were mailed to the surrounding property owners on <br />May 22, 2020, published in the Boulder Daily Camera on May 24, 2020, and the <br />property was posted on May 22, 2020. <br />Ritchie begins her presentation with discussing the property's location and background <br />history. <br />She then discusses the GDP proposal. The proposal is as follows: <br />• Amends use areas to align with existing property lines <br />• Allows portions of Zone 1 to develop with Zone 2 uses <br />• Adds light industrial to Zone 2 as a use by right <br />• Adds car wash as a special review use <br />• Amends FAR zones to a two -tiered system rather than three -tiered <br />• Revise street network from public to private <br />• Reduce building setback to 55' from 60' <br />• Allow parking between buildings and S. 96th Street with enhanced landscaping, <br />rather than behind buildings <br />• Adds option for slanted roofline elements for buildings fronting S. 96th Street, <br />rather than only requiring pitched roofs <br />• Amends heights for Zone 2B to 40' from 35' <br />• Amends FAR to increase from 306,531 sf to 369,479 sf <br />She also compares the properties current FAR and proposed FAR. She then gives an in <br />depth analysis of the 2013 comprehensive plan and discusses the components that do <br />meet the policy and components that do not meet the policy. The components that meet <br />policy are: <br />• Uses are acknowledged in comprehensive plan <br />• Private streets provide same connectivity <br />• Height increase is consistent with intended character of GDP and surrounding <br />development <br />• FAR increase is within comprehensive plan limits and maintains the west to east <br />transition <br />• Traffic study reflects slightly less impact <br />• Fiscal benefit to the city <br />The components that do not meet policy are: <br />• Setback reduction <br />• Roof proposal in Zone 2A <br />Staff Recommendations. - <br />Staff recommends approval of Resolution 2, Series 2020, with the following conditions: <br />• The applicant shall revise the application to provide for a minimum 60-foot building <br />and parking setback. <br />