Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 08 13

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 25, 2020 Page 16 of 24 The applicant shall revise the GDP height limits within Zone 2A to be a maximum of 25 ft if a pitched roof is provided or 20 ft if slanted roofline architectural elements are provided. Commissioner Questions of Staff. Howe asks if staff has considered the option of a trail connecting to the Coal Creek Trail that is just to the north. Ritchie says that that it is already an existing requirement within the GDP. It also requires an eight foot detached sidewalk on the S. 96t" Street and Dillon frontage. Howe asks if the eight foot sidewalk affects parking. Ritchie says that staff does not believe it will affect parking because the eight foot sidewalk will be located entirely within the right of way. Diehl asks if the original rezoning involves the zoning to cross over all throughout the properties. Is that for them to be developed with a singular design? If we amend to do this, is there a possibility that the individual properties will be developed a little more independently? Ritchie states that when it says to align the uses within the existing property lines, much of the existing GDP also had that. More of what they were doing is feathering in the height and floor area ratios more distinctly. In this circumstance, it is unlikely given the current ownership that we would see unified development on this property as it stands today. That is why the applicant is proposing to make some of these changes to facilitate development over time. The GDP agreement and the GDP itself is still intended to work with one another in a manner that works for everyone and S. 96tn Street. Diehl says so it is currently zoned PCZD and we are not changing that correct? Ritchie says that is correct. The only use change is the introduction of the light industrial uses and the introduction of a car wash as a special review. Other than that, the use is staying the same. Applicant Presentation: Jim Candy, Co -Pastor of Ascent Church Candy starts by saying that the church's intent is to be helpful to the city and they want to collaborate with the city, local businesses, and residents. He states that the property has been a challenge. His land attorney informed him that this property was the most challenging he has seen in the 30 years of his profession. Answering a commissioner's question earlier in the hearing, he says that the likelihood of all three property owners being simultaneous in their development is not likely.