My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2020 09 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2020 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2020 09 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2020 12:10:36 PM
Creation date
9/9/2020 3:31:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/9/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />May 13, 2020 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />Tamara Krantz 691 West Street. Curious if there would be more discussion on <br />Redtail Ridge. <br />8. 7:20 pm Discussion Item: Conservation Easement Proposal for the Project <br />321 (Medtronic) PUD. Presented By Lisa Ritchie, Planning Department. (20 <br />Minutes) Lisa Ritchie -Presentation power point; Ryan Construction; <br />Medtronic also available. <br />Red Tail Ridge GDP is under review its approximately 390 acres of the formal <br />Storage Tek property. This review includes a land dedication of Open Space, <br />Trail, and Parks. The Plat will be brought to you for review next month for larger <br />discussion. <br />Within Red Tail Ridge GDP we are now seeing PUD applications, architecture, <br />parking landscaping come forward. <br />Tonight Medtronic is proposing a 7 acres conservation easement buffer on the <br />northern part of Medtronic. No public access within the conservation easement; <br />enhanced landscaping in entry. <br />Question: <br />Jessamine -Who monitors conservations easements? <br />Nathan- Currently we don't hold conservation easements. We wouldn't monitor it. <br />We would have to look to other agencies. <br />Charles- Parcels A & C might be residential; F is Open Space so an easement <br />through B2 could make for good trail connectivity to F. Lisa -Medtronic applicant <br />asked to consider trail access but Medtronic said no because of security <br />protocols. OSAB should encourage -public benefit for conservation easement if <br />desired. <br />David -question regarding the pond in northeast corner. Lisa's response- The 7 <br />acre conservation easement wouldn't preclude the pond from being protected. <br />Helen -Propose to OSAB that OSAB would generally be in favor of this buffer <br />adjacent to open space, but we would like access through the site. Therefore, <br />regarding Question 3 we are interested in access to the site. Height and <br />clustering may be worth it to have the 7-acre conservation easement. Peter <br />agree with Helen's comments. <br />David— Going in excess of twice the height requirements. Need a variance <br />regardless at the site. Lisa- Operational perspective for Medtronic; we would <br />need to use more land if we go with less height; applicant would have to address <br />it. <br />Helen -what would this height do to view shed? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.