My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 10 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2020 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 10 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2020 4:12:01 PM
Creation date
10/19/2020 12:07:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
10/19/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />21 September 2020 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />much of its physical integrity; the fagade of the house has undergone minor changes over time <br />including changes to the siding as well as the addition of stone to the front porch but retains <br />significant architectural integrity when viewed from the street and appears to be in good <br />condition for its age. Staff finds that the structure met the landmarking criteria and <br />recommended approval of the landmark request as well as the name Koci House. <br />Selvoski also presented the alteration certificate request allowing the relocation of the <br />structure to 633 La Farge Avenue. While the relocation of historic structures is generally not a <br />preferred method of preservation, staff believes it is the only method of preserving 1201 <br />Lincoln Avenue and is therefore allowable in this situation. In addition to relocating the <br />structure, the alteration certificate also allows for the reconstruction of the front and rear <br />porches. Staff recommends approval of the alteration certificate for the property at 1201 <br />Lincoln Avenue allowing it to be relocated to 633 La Farge Avenue. <br />Selvoski presented the grant request for a matching grant in the amount of $85,000 and a <br />finding of extraordinary circumstances. She reminded the Commission that without <br />extraordinary circumstances, the maximum grant amount was $40,000. Selvoski noted that <br />the proposed work was eligible for coverage. Selvoski stated that staff found that the original <br />grant request included funds for City fees, however those expenses are not eligible for historic <br />preservation funds. The applicant altered their request to remove that item. Staff recommends <br />approval of the grant request in the amount of $85,000. <br />Andy Johnson, DAJ Design, spoke as the applicant and presented on the current status of the <br />house and it potential relocation. He noted the quantity and quality of the original materials that <br />remain on the house. The front porch has been altered and the house is missing some detailing <br />that can be replaced. Johnson mentioned that the chimney may need to be removed prior to the <br />relocation. He also discussed Louisville's history of relocating structures to and within the city. <br />Johnson confirmed that the proposal does meet the zoning requirements in regards to parking, <br />setbacks, lot coverage and will not require any variances. <br />Levi Sheppard, owner of 633 La Farge Avenue, stated that the move was scheduled for the <br />second week in October (tentatively) and that they're very excited about saving a piece of <br />Louisville's history. <br />Dunlap asked what the plans were regarding the front porch. Andy Johnson responded that the <br />plans were to return it to the original Craftsman -style porch. <br />Public Comments: <br />Dan Berlau, current owner of 1201 Lincoln, stated that he and his wife are excited about <br />participating in this process and the possible relocation. <br />Discussion: <br />Haley commented that the structure meets the requirements for landmarking and has <br />undergone minimal changes. The structure is proposed to be relocated which means it will lose <br />a tie to the property, but is less of a loss than a complete demolition. <br />Parris responded that regardless of the property where this structure is placed, it meets enough <br />of the criteria to be eligible for landmarking. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.