My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2020 07 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2020 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2020 07 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2020 10:35:22 AM
Creation date
11/12/2020 10:35:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
7/9/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 09, 2020 <br />Page 9 of 17 <br /> <br /> <br />Howe asks since it is privately owned, has there been any comment from this owner? <br /> <br />Brennan refers to Emilia since her team is working on the drainage report with them. <br /> <br />Emilia says that the owner has not expressed any concern with the use of the land to <br />their knowledge. <br /> <br />Brauneis mentions that there were many public comments regarding the security <br />measures. Do these security measures fit within the best practices for this type of <br />business? <br /> <br />Banks says that there are many protocols we use that fit within the best practices for <br />this type of business. For example, when closing we have a procedure where no one <br />opens or closes the store by themselves. We also have a security guard on site 24-7. <br />We outsource a lot of the security. <br /> <br />Moline says that it looks like a lot of the landscaping is located in the drainage swale. <br />Will that hinder the drainage with all that landscaping in that location? <br /> <br />Brennan says the swale is not a traditional swale but acts more like a berm. It actually <br />would be raised and that way it blocks the offsite drainage and minimizes runoff from <br />going to the trail corridor and to the residential neighborhood. <br /> <br />Williams asks if the berm is irrigated. <br /> <br />Brennan says that in terms of watering for the plantings, he is unsure. <br /> <br />Emilia says she is also unsure but assumes that it is irrigated. <br /> <br />Williams asks if it drains to the north into the detention pond. <br /> <br />Brennan says that the flows would not go further than the swale. <br /> <br />Williams states that the landscape area is draining to the west and then to the north <br />onto the back of the property. She then asks staff if the current applicant is the original <br />applicant for this marijuana license. <br /> <br />Brennan says that it is. <br /> <br />Public Comment: <br />Laura Chernikoff, 1459 Hecla Way <br /> <br />Chernikoff says she is the closet townhouse to this property. She is a three story <br />townhouse and says that the proposed 6 ft fence does nothing for the property. The <br />applicant choosing to place the building on Hecla Way and not further back on the <br />property leaves the parking directly facing her building. She is concerned about parking <br />headlights shining through her windows. She appreciates that the applicant says he <br />wants to be a good neighbor but herself and other neighbors have reached out and not
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.