Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 16, 2020 <br />Page 5 of 12 <br /> <br />Moline says that it is close to schools but it meets the buffer requirement. Since it <br />meets that buffer and has been issued the appropriate license, the necessary boxes <br />have been checked. <br /> <br />Williams points out that it is interesting that they are discussing revitalization as part of <br />the criteria. We are now putting three marijuana retail shops in close proximity to each <br />other. This area is already dilapidated. She thinks it would be better to spread it out and <br />not have it all in the same location. <br /> <br />Hoefner mentions that this use would go there regardless if they changed the zoning. <br />The zoning change would allow less industrial types of business should this business <br />not work out in the future. He suggests that during the commissioner comments portion <br />of the hearing, the commissioners could ask staff about having more of a buffer. <br /> <br />Moline mentions that they should possibly consider how the applicant has made a good <br />faith effort to follow the city’s regulations and have determined that this is a space that <br />meets the rules and regulations. We need to make sure we are treating the businesses <br />fairly when they are using our land use code when choosing a location for their <br />business. <br /> <br />Williams says that based on the fact the zoning that it currently is can be a marijuana <br />shop, it has nothing to do with us rezoning from CB to CC. She mentions that the way it <br />is being brought forth to them is a bit misleading. She asks why they are discussing <br />marijuana shops when they should just be discussing re-zoning. <br /> <br />Moline says that he was trying to address Commissioner Howe’s question. He agrees <br />that this is a matter of rezoning not marijuana. <br /> <br />Williams says she agrees that Commissioner Howe has a great question and thought <br />of that question herself. She feels that the way staff presented this was misleading <br />though. We are discussing two different issues that have nothing to do with each other. <br /> <br />Rice mentions that he is personally not a fan of these types of businesses but says that <br />that is not for him to decide. City council has already made these policy decisions to <br />have marijuana in the city. He thinks this is far too close to schools but this is meeting <br />city code and has the appropriate buffer. As far as how this was presented to the <br />commissioners, it is already zoned to handle this. It is only being brought to the <br />commissioners because of the revitalization document, which says that if the use is <br />changed, the zoning has to be updated to mixed-use. It really is just a technical exercise <br />and is not asking the commissioners to weigh in on the policy aspect. <br /> <br />Williams makes it clear that she disagrees with this policy but says that it is not what <br />they are weighing in on tonight. <br /> <br />Brauneis agrees that it is not their responsibility to weigh in on the policy. It was passed <br />with eyes wide open that these locations were going to be possible locations for these <br />types of business. <br />