Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 13, 2020 <br />Page 10 of 12 <br /> <br />Staff Presentation: <br />Before staff begins their presentation, Brennan verifies that this application’s public <br />notice requirements have been met. They were mailed to the surro unding property <br />owners on July 24, 2020, published in the Boulder Daily Camera on July 26, 2020, and <br />the property was posted on July 24, 2020. <br /> <br />Brennan discusses the property’s location, background history, and the applicant’s <br />proposal. <br /> <br />Brennan concludes by saying that staff finds that the proposal meets the PUD criteria <br />outlined in Section 17.28.120 of the Louisville Municipal Code and that there are no <br />additional waivers being requested. <br /> <br /> <br />Staff Recommendations: <br />Staff recommends approval of Resolution 10, Series 2020, a resolution recommending <br />approval of an amendment to the Parbois Place Planned Unit Development to remove <br />the demolition requirement for the garage on Lot 6. <br /> <br />Commissioner Questions of Staff: <br />Diehl asks if staff has any theories of why this was a requirement. <br /> <br />Brennan says that if he had to speculate, requiring the original developer to demolish <br />the structures would perhaps make the lots more desirable or developable. The original <br />PUD identified these southern six parcels to be single family dwellings, but it did not <br />identify specific construction on those lots. He assumes that possibly having the original <br />developer be responsible for the demolition of those structures might not make the <br />future home buyer financially responsible for the demolition. <br /> <br />Howe mentions that staff said that there was an original demolition after the PUD was <br />passed. What is the liability of concern now that we are saying that they do not have to <br />demolish? <br /> <br />Brennan clarifies that there was no demolition that took place. The original subdivision <br />requirement had two demolition requirements, one for this existing garage on Lot 6 and <br />the other for the existing home on Lot 3. Both those demolitions were supposed to take <br />place within 36 months of the adoption of the PUD but neither one has occurred. <br /> <br />Williams asks if removing this means that they can choose whether or not to demolish <br />it. <br /> <br />Brennan says that is correct. <br /> <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />None is heard. <br /> <br />Commissioner Questions of Applicant: <br />None is heard. <br />