My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2020 08 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2020 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2020 08 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2020 10:36:38 AM
Creation date
11/12/2020 10:36:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
8/13/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 13, 2020 <br />Page 11 of 12 <br /> <br />Public Comment: <br />Ritchie informs the commissioners that staff received additional letters of public support <br />and asks if they would like to add this documentation into the meeting’s record. <br /> <br />Howe and Moline moves to include this documentation into the meeting’s record. <br />Motion passes unanimously by a roll call vote. <br /> <br />Closing Statement by Staff: <br />None is heard. <br /> <br />Closing Statement by Applicant: <br />None is heard. <br /> <br />Discussion by Commissioners: <br />Moline moves and Hoefner seconds to approve Resolution 10, Series 2020. Motion <br />passes unanimously by a roll call vote. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />Rice mentions the continued discussion of the possibility of having a cutoff time of when <br />the commissioners can receive public comment or new material from the applicant and <br />staff. He asks staff if the commissioners can make their own rules for this. <br /> <br />Ritchie say they technically can but they would like make those through the by-laws. <br />The city clerk is aware that planning commission is having this discussion. City council <br />is setup differently than planning commission in that when the general city council email <br />receives an email, it is also automatically forwarded to their personal email as well. <br />They are getting the emails in real time unlike the commissioners. She shows the <br />commissioners what other jurisdictions polices are regarding this subject. Most of <br />Louisville’s neighboring cities have some type of adopted cutoff time. An option for a <br />cutoff time would possible be no later than 4:30 in the afternoon on the day of the <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Diehl asks what would happen if a written comment comes in after the deadline. <br /> <br />Ritchie says that when that happens now, it becomes a part of the record but it does <br />not carry over to planning commission’s review. <br /> <br />Howe says that it is important to enter all public comment into the record, but believes a <br />deadline is important and should be communicated to the public that because it did not <br />meet the deadline, the submission may or may not be read by the commissioners. <br /> <br />Rice says that he believes that all comments can and should be entered into the record. <br />His thought is to make a notice to all comments that they are to be received within a <br />certain time and commissioners may not be able to read them if they are not received <br />within that particular time. <br /> <br />Diehl says he agrees with Rice. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.