My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2020 12 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
ECONOMIC VITALITY COMMITTEE
>
2020 Economic Vitality Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2020 12 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2020 8:50:50 AM
Creation date
12/28/2020 11:45:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
12/18/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Economic Vitality Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 18, 2020 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />The next steps are to review areas of responsibility, inform other parties <br />involved in the plan, and discuss approach to 2021 initiatives. <br />VII. Discussion- Recovery & Improvement Matching Grant Program Update: <br />Director Pierce reviewed the memo and approaches to allocating and <br />reconciling funds. She indicated there have been two applicants since the initial <br />funding closed and that the application does remain open. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Maloney said he did not want the $150,000 of approved funding <br />to interfere with important improvements being made for those that had applied <br />after November 6, 2020. <br />Councilmember Leh clarified how many businesses had applied (36) compared <br />to how many were approved for funding (29). He suggested reconciliation could <br />be simplified through representation by each businesses since the program is a <br />good example of public/private partnership and resulted in significant dollars <br />spent on improvements locally. He also advocated for sharing the program <br />broadly with the community to see the impact of tax dollars at work. <br />Chair Dickinson said it was a well conceived program and participation was <br />what the Committee hoped. He suggested an additional $50,000 of funding <br />could provide leeway to accommodate those in the queue as well as let others <br />know there is still funding available. <br />Director Pierce responded that additional funding may be helpful but that she <br />also foresees that business support may need to take a different or more <br />targeted focus given the transition to Level Red and the impact on certain <br />industries. <br />VIII. Economic Vitality Committee Purpose and Function: Director Pierce <br />introduced the item with a summary from the staff memo —including the various <br />stakeholders to economic vitality and their current roles. Chair Dickinson said <br />that the EVC was formed to create a strategic plan and now that work is done. If <br />the Committee is to continue, then there should be a revision to the purpose of <br />what the group is trying to accomplish. <br />Councilmember Leh suggested the real issue at hand is related to the BRaD <br />Committee and the role of business stakeholders. He believes the focus should <br />be on the best organization vehicle for City Council to regularly receive <br />feedback from business stakeholders and also for Council to disseminate <br />information and collaborate. <br />Mark Oberholzer, Chair of the BRaD Committee, provided a brief history of the <br />Committee and shared that BRaD does not have a good connection to Council <br />at this time. He suggested the new strategic plan could help to give a <br />reformatted Committee a better focus. <br />Agenda Packet P. 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.