Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2021 02 11

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 12, 2020 Page 2 of 10 Zuccaro explained that the property was part of the Centennial Valley General Development Plan from 1983 and included a strip center and a standalone bank. There was a PUD approved for both buildings and the property owner now wanted to split the lot so each development would be on its own property. Staff reviewed the request to ensure that the lots could stand on their own and that the division would facilitate future redevelopment. Staff also worked with the applicant on shared use area issues, including access, drainage, and easements. Zuccaro stated that staff recommended approval with the following conditions: • Updated ownership and dedication signature block to meet City standards. • Add note to plat providing for shared maintenance of shared access drive, drainage facilities, and landscape area. • Add maintenance table to play outlining maintenance responsibility between each lot owner of shared use areas. • Amend the existing Permanent Stormwater Best Management Practices Maintenance Agreement to address shared use and maintenance of stormwater facilities. • Add 10-foot wide dry utility easements along south and east property lines, as requested by Xcel Energy. Brauneis asked for disclosures and conflicts of interest. None. Howe asked if each of the lots would meet requirements for drainage. Zuccaro responded that they would not meet drainage requirements individually. Zuccaro noted that it was common to have shared drainage and shared maintenance of drainage across multiple lots and that could even be a benefit. He added that the properties would self -contain their own parking and meet the open space and setbacks requirements. Chris Strawn of Ware Malcomb, applicant, offered to answer questions. Brauneis asked Mr. Strawn to respond to the conditions from staff. Strawn replied that he had no issues with the conditions and that he was prepared to move forward with them. Rice stated that it made sense to deal with the two properties separately, which the proposal helped to achieve. He added that staff had dealt with all the easement issues in their conditions. Diehl expressed his support and appreciated that the applicant was willing to address staff's conditions. Williams agreed that it met all of the conditions and it made sense to be able to sell the properties separately.