Laserfiche WebLink
<br />application for a development permit or <br />other request for land use approval by a <br />local government be subject to any <br />regulation of the local government that is <br />pending at the time of the application or <br />request, so long as the pending regulation <br />is adopted on or before the date a decision <br />is made on the application or request, and <br />so long as the local government has not <br />unreasonably delayed its decision on the <br />application or request HB 1106 also <br />authorizes a local government to adopt a <br />regulation when necessary for the <br />immediate preservation of the public health <br />or safety and to enforce such a pending <br />regulation in relation to an application or <br />request that is pending at the time of the <br />adoption of the regulation. <br /> <br />Bill: HB 09-1106, Pending ordinance <br />doctrine <br />Sponsors: Rep. Dickey Lee Hullinghorst, <br />D-Longmont; Sen. Dan Gibbs, <br />D-S ilverthorne <br />Status: H Local Government <br />lobbyist: Erin Goff <br /> <br />Sewer bill back up into Capitol <br /> <br />A dispute between the City of Littleton and <br />a couple of special districts to whom the <br />City sells sewer service is the subject of a <br />bill recently introduced. HB 09-1006 <br />proposes to amend a long-standing <br />municipal statute that provides that <br />municipalities may sell extraterritorial savvier <br />service at rates that are "just, reasonable <br />and necessary." The districts, which are <br />complaining that the City's actions were <br />unjust and unreasonable, are proposing to <br />add to the statute a va riety of new <br />standards, limitations and protest <br />procedures in order to improve their <br />position in their ongoing fight with the City <br />of Littleton. <br /> <br />The League is urging members of the Local <br />Government Committee that this local <br />dispute between the City and a couple of <br />special districts that chose to purchase <br />service on the open market rather than <br />develop their own wastewater treatment <br />capacity is a local matter. The current law is <br />completely adequate; if the districts have a <br />problem, they should be taking it to the <br />courthouse, not the Statehouse. <br /> <br />Bill: HB 09-1006, Extraterritorial sewer <br />rates <br />Sponsors: Rep. Jim Kerr, R-Litlleton; Sen. <br />Mike Kopp, R-Litlleton <br />Status: H Local Government <br />Position: Oppose <br />lobbyist: Geoff Wilson <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Sales tax collections <br /> <br />At the urging of Colorado Counties Inc., <br />Rep. Bob Gardner, R-Colorado Springs, <br />has introduced a bill that would permit <br />county commissioners to locally collect <br />their sales tax, similar to the prerogative of <br />home rule municipalities under the <br />Colorado Constitution. Presently, counties, <br />like statutory municipalities, have their <br />sales tax collected by the Department of <br />Revenue. <br /> <br />While CML has been aware that a county <br />local collection bill was in the offing (CCI <br />staff has been very forthcoming with us on <br />this issue), review of the bill actually <br />introduced raises some troubling issues for <br />municipalities. CML will be discussing our <br />concerns with CCI, to see if we can resolve <br />them. <br /> <br />For example, the bill would have counties <br />collecting not just their own taxes locally, <br />but state and statutory municipal sales <br />taxes as well. The bill contains little or <br />nothing addressing whether a county must <br />demonstrate professional, fiscal and <br />administrative capability to assume the <br />critical role of collecting municipalities' <br />sales tax. Further, the bill permits multi- <br />jurisdictional retailers (that is, virtually all <br />large retailers, other than independent, <br />"mom and pop" businesses) to continue to <br />remit state, county and municipal sales tax <br />to the State. So, local businesses will remit <br />municipal tax to the county, while big <br />businesses will remit municipal tax to the <br />State. CML is troubled by this aspect of the <br /> <br />billr as \Ne do not see any municipal benefit <br /> <br />in dividing collection of our main revenue <br />stream between two levels of government <br /> <br />Also troubling is that the bill is devoid of <br />any provision for consultation with a <br />municipality by the county proposing to <br />collect the municipality's taxes. <br /> <br />This bill arises from county frustration with <br />collection efforts on their behalf by the <br />Department of Revenue. CML has always <br />felt, and have shared this with CCI, that a <br />three-way discussion with the Department <br />of Revenue involving counties and <br />municipalities over collection efforts is far <br />preferable to bills at the Statehouse. This <br />bill proposes a complicated "solution" to a <br />problem that is, as yet, ill-defined. The <br />League would prefer a more deliberate <br />approach to defining the problem, before a <br />solution is proposed. <br /> <br />Bill: HB 09-1130, Sales tax collections <br />Sponsors: Rep. Bob. Gardner, R-Colorado <br />Springs; Sen. Jim Isgar, D-Hesperus <br />Status: H Local Government <br />Position: Neutral <br />lobbyist: Geoff Wilson <br /> <br />Transportation - Funding <br /> <br />CML joined Gov. Bill Ritter and other <br />supporters last Wednesday to rollout a <br />transportation finance bill dubbed FASTER <br />(Funding Advancements for Surface <br />Transportation and Economic Recovery <br />Act). The bill has not been introduced as of <br />this printing. It is an extensive bill that <br />increases vehiCle registration fees with two <br />surcharges for road safety projects and a <br />special bridge enterprise fund. <br /> <br />The average passenger vehicle or light <br />truck would pay an additional $41 a year. <br />Local governments will share the road <br />safety money on the Highway Users Tax <br />Fund formula (18 percent to municipalities). <br />The Colorado Department of Transportation <br />estimates that fund will raise a total of $160 <br />million - making the municipal share nearly <br />$29 million. Municipalities currently gain <br />about $100 million each year from HUTF. <br />$100 million from a separate vehiCle <br />registration surcharge will be dedicated to <br />state bridge projects. <br /> <br />The bill also reorganizes the CDOT Tolling <br />Enterprise. It allows tolling of existing lanes <br />with the consent of affected local <br />governments. The bill encourages CDOT <br />look for public-private partnerships and <br />other alternatives that use private sector <br />investment for public projects. <br /> <br />A pilot program to study the advisability of <br />switching the gasoline tax to a vehicle miles <br />traveled tax is included, as well as creating <br />an internal CDOT efficiency commission. <br /> <br />Finally, the bill expands the elements that <br />regional transportation plans must look at <br />to inClude topics such as transit alternatives <br />and greenhouse gas generation. <br /> <br />FASTER is a direct result of the Governor's <br />Blue Ribbon Transportation Panel in which <br />CML has been heavily involved for the past <br />two years. <br /> <br />Bill: FASTER <br />Sponsors: Sen. Dan Gibbs, <br />D-Silverthorne; Rep. Joe Rice, D-Littleton <br />Status: <br />Position: Support <br />lobbyist: Mark Radtke <br /> <br />Transportation - Highways <br /> <br />- State highway abandonment <br /> <br />HB 09-1114 is an even larger state <br />turnback bill than last year's defeated effort. <br />The bill requires the Transportation <br />Commission to identify all state highways <br />within Metropolitan Transportation Planning <br />Organization boundaries that carry 80 <br />percent of their traffic to and from <br />destinations within that MPO. Those <br />segments of state highway would then be <br />transferred to the appropriate county or <br /> <br />STATEHOUSE REPORT <br />