My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2021 04 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2021 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2021 04 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2021 12:33:05 PM
Creation date
4/21/2021 12:53:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/19/2021
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2) Step down the mass of larger buildings to minimize the perceived scale at the <br />street. <br />While there is a material change from the third to the first and second floors, there is no <br />predominate step down in massing of the primary structure behind the decks. While the <br />composite or hardi-panel lower element provides some semblance of different massing <br />at the base, the primary massing of the building does not have any articulation between <br />floors. <br />C6. If a third story is to be used, it should appear as a subordinate "addition" to a two- <br />story building. <br />1) In downtown, a third story may be incorporated into a commercial type building <br />when it satisfies all requirements established in the Downtown Louisville <br />Framework Plan. <br />2) The third floor should be set back substantially from the sidewalk edge such that <br />the building will appear to be two stories in height as seen from across the street. <br />3) The third floor should also be set back from alley facades as well. <br />4) Materials and details should be simpler than those of the primary facade. <br />This policy suggests setting the third story back significantly from the front facade to <br />shield the third story from view. This is highlighted in the image below where the blue <br />area is the w potential loer level building <br />massing and red area on the third floor <br />demonstrates a deeper third -story setback. <br />The intent is also demonstrated in the <br />images to the right that are included with <br />this policy in the Design Handbook. Staff <br />acknowledges this would require redesign <br />of the units and likely reconfiguration of the <br />site plan and parking area behind the <br />buildings to be feasible, but does <br />demonstrate closer compliance to the intent <br />of this policy. Alternatively, staff notes that <br />the maximum allowed height in the <br />transition area where only two stories is <br />allowed is 35' compared to the 36' proposed <br />for the new homes, suggesting the overall <br />height of the proposal is consistent with two <br />story massing. Within the Core Area, <br />buildings may be up to 45' in height. <br />Louisville Municipal Code Sec. 17.12.040 <br />(footnote no. 10) describes the height and <br />building story allowances for Downtown and <br />notes the City Council may require lower <br />building heights "in order to ensure varied <br />building heights and the appearance of a <br />two-story building mass from the street <br />pedestrian scale." <br />HPC <br />This inlrll huilding in Tclluridr, CO. appears to be a two-story <br />r budding. but hasa third -story clemcm to the roar (helow) which <br />is set back substantially from the street and is differentlated in <br />materials. <br />April 19, 2020 <br />12 <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.