Planning Commission Minutes 2008 08 14

Metadata

Thumbnails

Annotations

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 14, 2008 Page 2 of 11 Public Notice: Published in the Daily Camera on June 22, 2008. Posted in City Hall, Public Library, Recreation Center and the Police and Courts Building and mailed to surrounding property owners on June 20,2008. Continued from July 10,2008 meeting. Conflict of Interest and Disclosure: None heard. Staff Report of Facts and Issues: Wood discussed the following: . Purpose of hearing is to complete the work of the July 10, 2008 public hearing. . Reviewed the record of the July 10th hearing. . Brought back findings of disapproval to the Commission per their direction at the July 10th hearing. . Packet contains o Two copies of Resolution No. 13 - the original which is an approval and a revised resolution which is for disapproval. o Applicant Letter dated July 17, 2008 o Applicant response to concerns raised at the July 10th hearing o July 10th Staff Report and original public notice Lipton recognized Sheets. Sheets requested the City Attorney provide additional direction to the Commission. Sam Light, City Attorney, discussed the following with the Commission: . Review of the action taken by the Commission at the July 10th hearing. . Noted final adoption of a resolution did not occur at the July 10th hearing. . Staff and applicant can make final comments or summary statements. . New factual evidence can not be presented by either staff or the applicant. If new evidence were to be presented then a new public notice is required and a continuation to the next public hearing date. The two items in the packet from the applicant are not considered new information but as summary comments of the July 10th hearing. Lipton asked Light if the public hearing should be re-opened. Light stated the public hearing should not be re-opened but the applicant and staff should be allowed to provide a closing summary statement. Lipton asked if the Commission could take additional public comment. Light stated only the applicant and staff can provide summary statements or comments. Applicant Summarv Comments: Garrett Mundelein, 555 County Road stated he had brought a paper copy of the last slide of an electronic presentation at the July 10th. He stated the last slide was not a good image. He asked Light if he could provide the Commission with the paper copies. Light asked if the paper copy was an exact copy of the electronic image. Mundelein stated it was not because some of the land contours had been changed.