Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2021 07 08

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 10, 2021 Page 2 of 15 sent in after June 4th had not been published in the staff packet and if the commissioners had read those comments. Brauneis shared that they would be reopening public comment for this evening on the Redtail Ridge item. Krantz stated that there was a group of people who had been saying public comment would not be allowed tonight. Zuccaro replied that staff had presented the item as a continuance and that an item could go through changes while being discussed over multiple meetings. Staff felt that the applicant's revisions had been made public. Regarding the written comments, staff had shared all of the recent public comments in a packet addendum up until the comments received this afternoon. Zuccaro was unsure why anyone was saying there would not be public comment on Redtail tonight. Brauneis noted that they tried to accommodate everyone by allowing comments up until a couple hours before meetings. He encouraged people to send their comments sooner, but an earlier cutoff would squelch public comment. He shared that he personally had reviewed all of the public comments. CONTINUED BUSINESS — PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Redtail Ridge General Development Plan Amendment: A request for an amendment to the ConocoPhillips Campus General Development Plan (Redtail Ridge Master Plan) to allow a mixed industrial, office and commercial development with up to 3,115,000 gross square feet of building area on a 3890.10 acre property (Resolution 6, Series 2021). CONTINUED FROM MAY 20, 2021. • Applicant: Brue Baukol Capital Partners • Case Planner: Rob Zuccaro, Director of Planning and Building Safety Zuccaro stated that the item was noticed for its original hearing date and had been continued twice to a date certain so all public hearing notice had been met. Hoefner recused himself. Howe stated that he because he valued the integrity of the Planning Commission and its processes, he would restate some details presented at the last Commission meeting. He stated that he walked down a road adjacent to the proposed development and he had been alone and had no ex parte communication outside of the Commission meetings. He would be asking staff about any findings or observations made during his walk during the meeting tonight. Moline restated that he was an employee of Boulder County Parks and Open Space, which had provided referral comments on the development. He was not involved in the creation of those comments and had consulted with the City and County attorneys and felt he was capable of acting as a commissioner on the item. 4