My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2021 08 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2021 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2021 08 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2021 6:19:32 PM
Creation date
8/16/2021 2:58:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
8/12/2021
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 8, 2021 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />Moline moved to approve Resolution 9, Series 2021. Howe seconded. Motion passed <br />unanimously by roll call vote. <br />769 CTC Blvd PUD and plat: A request for approval of a PUD to allow an industrial <br />building and associated site improvements and a replat to consolidate two lots into one <br />(Resolution No. 11, Series 2021). CONTINUED FROM JUNE 24, 2021. <br />• Applicant: Andrew Graybar, Exeter Property Group <br />• Case Planner: Ellie Hassan, Planner II <br />All notice requirements were met. <br />Hassan described the application, which included an industrial building proposal and a <br />lot consolidation. Staff found that the proposal met the relevant criteria and had added a <br />condition regarding additional landscaping and a retaining wall. Hassan stated that the <br />applicant had agreed to the condition. <br />Diehl asked for clarification on the location of the property and Planner Hassan <br />described the parcels, stating that the property to the west was unincorporated. <br />Diehl asked about the landscaping buffer. <br />Hassan replied that the IDDSG usually required a smaller landscape buffer, but since <br />this was considered agriculturally zoned and it was more of a residential space by use, <br />the IDDSG required a 25-foot landscape buffer between uses, which the applicant <br />provided. <br />Matt Adams, 2975 Grove Street in Denver, described the site layout, stating that they <br />had used the previously approved PUD as a guideline. Modifications to that plan <br />included adding outdoor amenity areas for employees and pedestrian connectivity and <br />the deferred parking to be trigger if a use required additional parking. <br />Justin McCarthy, 1980 North Pennsylvania Street in Denver, stated that they were <br />meeting and exceeding what's there right now. <br />Diehl asked if there had been any conversations or collaborations with the neighbor who <br />had sent comments to staff and the Commission. <br />Hassan replied that staff had put the resident and applicants in touch. <br />Blake Esfeld, 5979 North Fulton in Denver, stated that they had contacted the neighbor <br />about providing the buffer zone. He stated they were willing to work with him regarding <br />any additional requests. <br />The Commission asked Mr. Esfeld to display the buffer that affected the adjacent <br />property owner, and Mr. Esfeld showed the rendering. <br />Adams stated that they hoped they had brought a project that fit into the CTC and were <br />working with staff on the condition that staff proposed. <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.