My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2020 10 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2020 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2020 10 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2021 2:45:16 PM
Creation date
10/19/2021 7:44:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
10/19/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Quality Check
10/19/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />19 October 2020 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />Selvoski presented the request and the criteria for a demolition review. She explained that the <br />house was 116 old and the garage was built later. Both structures had additions over time. The <br />house was tied to the DelPizzo family, who had strong ties to Louisville's Italian and mining <br />heritage. Selvoski noted that there had been materials in the basement for curing meat and <br />making wine. The house also exemplified early 20th-century stylings similar to other homes <br />throughout Louisville. The stucco was added historically. <br />Selvoski shared that the Commission may release the permit or place a stay on the application <br />for up to 180 days from the date of application, September 17, 2020. Staff recommended <br />placing a 60-day stay, expiring on November 16, 2020, as the applicant had been made aware f <br />all opportunities that exist through the historic preservation program and has been in <br />communication with staff. Staff also recommended release of the demolition request for the <br />garage. <br />Haley asked if the Historic Structure Assessment (HSA) had been approved. <br />Selvoski replied that the HSA had been granted, but not completed. <br />Keller asked what kind of repairs the home needed. <br />Phillip Larson, property owner at 1133 Main Street, described that he had been trying to <br />purchase the property since earlier in the year and that he had needed to remove the stucco <br />and conduct asbestos remediation. He noted that he had been in construction for over 30 years <br />and had worked on historic homes previously. He stated that the foundation was rubble stone <br />put together and the house had a series of additions over time. <br />Haley explained that additions and less -than -perfect foundations were part of the history of <br />Louisville, meaning that the Commission wanted to preserve the specific history of the coal - <br />mining community of Louisville even if the homes were very simple. <br />Larson showed the plans for the house he was trying to build. <br />Haley replied that the Commission appreciated any sensitive new building, but as a Commission <br />their first goal was to keep the city's historic authentic by keeping the original structure. She also <br />explained that the HSA was meant to help preserve that history, as well. <br />Larson stated his appreciation for the Commission's attempts to preserve history. Larson and <br />Chair Haley discussed different preservation projects in Louisville and the structural integrity of <br />the house. <br />Sara Aglietti, 1145 Main Street, neighbor to the north in the Caranci House, described the <br />history of her house, which reflected the wealth of the Caranci family and their history. Aglietti <br />stated that her home had large, historic windows that were warmed by the southern sun. She <br />stated that she would not be able to afford to keep her house due to the heating costs if the new <br />building on the 1133 Main lot was too large. <br />Dunlap noted that the stucco was historic and he asked if the stucco was salvageable after the <br />asbestos remediation. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.