My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2021 09 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2021 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2021 09 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:15:47 PM
Creation date
11/8/2021 2:20:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/21/2021
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 21, 2021 <br />Page 8 of 11 <br />Mayor Stolzmann noted there was a great deal of discussion on this topic in earlier <br />meetings which led us to this point. <br />Public Comments — None. <br />MOTION: Councilmember Dickinson moved to approve Ordinance No. 1814; <br />Councilmember Fahey seconded the motion. <br />Councilmember Dickinson stated this is a good solution to align the two regulations and <br />decrease the complexity for the retailers. <br />VOTE: Motion passed by unanimous roll call vote. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION — DARK SKIES AMORTIZATION POLICY <br />Interim Planning Director Ritchie stated this is a part of the Council's 2021 Work Plan; <br />Council gave direction to staff on a code amendment in July. Staff is requesting additional <br />discussion and direction regarding the amortization policy. <br />Staff suggests the schedule set for properties to come into compliance with any new rules <br />should be connected to the level of investment a property owner is putting into a property. <br />Alternatives could include non -conforming requirements, requirements only on new <br />development or redevelopment, or maintaining properties out of compliance. <br />Staff looked at how this would be implemented and what the costs would be. She <br />reviewed costs for an average single-family home to bring all outdoor lighting fixtures into <br />compliance. The Council could budget for incentives to help people with that cost <br />particularly if an aggressive time frame is what Council would like. She noted estimating <br />for commercial properties is more difficult as there are additional factors at play. <br />Ritchie stated staff has looked into how other cities have handled this. Boulder used a 15- <br />year amortization. They have no estimate of how many properties have come into <br />compliance and have only enforced the rules through new development and <br />redevelopment. They have not proactively reached out to property owners to require <br />compliance. <br />She reviewed some of the limitations there may be for a new ordinance including: for <br />single-family homes there is currently no process in place to review light fixtures for <br />compliance; a new ordinance could significantly increase the permit volume; and there is <br />no process in place to qualify low-income households. For commercial properties it will be <br />difficult to determine compliance on existing fixtures. And, there is not currently a level of <br />staffing in place to provide proactive enforcement given the number of properties and <br />compliance verification requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.