My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2021 11 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2021 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2021 11 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2021 5:13:34 PM
Creation date
11/8/2021 2:22:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
11/11/2021
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Currently, Section 8.3 of the subdivision agreement, included as an attachment, <br />provides that the development requires 24 units to be occupied by persons 55 years of <br />age and older through a deed restriction to be recorded on the properties and a <br />covenant agreement with the city that runs with the land. Some of the reasoning to add <br />the age restriction was to provide for a greater variety of housing types, which is <br />supported by Comprehensive Plan policy, and to limit any potential impacts on school <br />overcrowding. To date, the deed restrictions and covenant have not been finalized. <br />City Council indicated that the original reasons for this provision remain applicable, <br />therefore the applicant proposes to amend the Foundry subdivision agreement to <br />reduce the requirement from 75% (24 units) to 20% (12 units) occupancy by persons 55 <br />years of age and older. This is in addition to the obligation to comply with the city's <br />recently adopted inclusionary housing ordinance which requires 12% (8 units) to meet <br />the affordability requirements or provide the fee -in -lieu payment. <br />In response to the changes to commercial development, staff updated the Fiscal Model <br />reflected in the columns highlighted in yellow with the current proposal to compare with <br />the results of the previous assumptions. The table below assumes construction of the <br />entire 20,000 sf of commercial development with a three year build out of the entire site. <br />As a result, the fiscal impact to the city improves. Staff did not update the low scenario <br />model. Assuming that the additional 5,000 sf of commercial development is never <br />constructed under that scenario, the results of that model would not change. The <br />following table summarizes the results: <br />Foundry GDP Amendment Page 3 of 5 <br />PC — November 11, 2021 <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.