My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2009 04 28
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2001-2009 City Council Study Sessions
>
2009 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2009 04 28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:38:09 AM
Creation date
6/8/2009 10:23:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
6E1
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2009 04 28
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />April 28, 2009 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />A resolution is being brought forward for information and discussion at the next <br />city council meeting. <br /> <br />Staff and Council members discussed general overarching compliance aspects <br />for members of Boards and Commissions. Discussion focused on exceptions, <br />such as medical, for the requirement of missing more than three meetings. The <br />idea of possible changes to the structure of the meeting requirements to be a <br />percentage of total annual meetings was explored. Questions considered: <br />What are the possible causes for dismissal? <br />What is the definition of cause? <br />Council members discussed possible conflicts of an overarching policy with other <br />boards and commissions by-laws and resolutions, but felt overall guiding <br />principles had value. <br /> <br />Based on the proposal, the City Manager reviews compliance issues - considers <br />the basis, rules, and requirements on a case by case basis. Something that <br />does merit removal is then prepared for council and brought forward to the City <br />Council. The member being removed is given notification of the issue being <br />brought to the Council. <br /> <br />Discussion focused on the belief that board or commission members represent <br />the City and should be held to high standards of conduct. The City Attorney has <br />indicated that a resolution is necessary for any implementation of dismissing for <br />cause. The City Manager serves as a screening function, not a final decision <br />maker. Possible issues include the sensitive nature of a personnel action, and <br />should this be discussed in Executive Session. Is that appropriate? A problem <br />arises when "no" decisions can be made in executive session. The process <br />could possibly include confidential reviews by the Manager, and a determination <br />if there are grounds to bring the issue forward. The process might include the <br />involvement of board and commission staff liaisons. <br /> <br />Advance Agenda review. <br />. Is there an ordinance that prohibits the feeding of animals? <br />. Discuss "swarms" in the presentation of agricultural ordinances, and <br />include all applicable information in regards to bee-keeping. <br />. RV ordinance discussion. <br /> <br />Adjourn 8:40 p. m. <br /> <br />Submitted by Rhonda Welborn <br />May 1, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.