My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2021 06 24
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2021 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2021 06 24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2022 3:32:20 PM
Creation date
2/3/2022 3:26:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/24/2021
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Quality Check
2/3/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 24, 2021 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />Ritchie replied that there were no requirements for letters of intent and that concurrency <br />was tied to core and shell commercial construction. <br />Brian Bair, 7552 North 83rd Street, Longmont, described his company, Colorado -based <br />Mass Equities. He described the neighborhood context and the surrounding density, <br />which ranged from condos to single-family developments and commercial use and <br />stated that they were in line with surrounding density. He described the proposed uses, <br />including attached residential, retail and commercial, and a community park. Bair stated <br />that this was the fourth iteration of the plan and they had worked with staff and the <br />community to help it fit the neighborhood. He stated that it would be 10 units per acre <br />and the concurrency changes were to help make sure commercial got built. Regarding <br />traffic, Bair stated that there would be 40% fewer daily trips in this GDP than the current <br />one and that the GDP had been developed in conversation with the community, staff, <br />and CDOT. He stated that they had covered parking and guest parking to keep cars off <br />the street and there was ample commercial parking to avoid spilling into the <br />neighborhoods. Bair described the community and neighborhood engagement process, <br />in which over 60 people attended a presentation of the plan and he described the <br />actions taken based on community feedback. Bair shared that commercial trends were <br />not very good over past several years, which was a concern for developments over <br />15,000 feet, whereas commercial under 15,000 was geared toward serving the local <br />neighborhood. He stated that it would take time but they thought it would be successful. <br />Diehl asked about the dirt pile. <br />Bair replied that they didn't own the property and the current owner had placed the dirt <br />there in anticipation of a future development. <br />Ritchie added that the pile had been authorized through a storm water permit <br />inconsistent with processes now. She stated that redevelopment would remove it in the <br />long term. <br />Hoefner asked how community engagement efforts would continue. <br />Bair replied that they intended to continue the process using their mailing list and the <br />60+ people who had attended their events from the local community and by contacting <br />HOAs. <br />Williams asked what kind of commercial use was anticipated. <br />Bair listed neighborhood -serving tenants such as restaurants, coffee, and ice cream and <br />stated that they were making an effort to go after food and beverage and other <br />community services. He added that the neighborhood feedback had wanted those uses <br />and he thought their layout would capture those kinds of tenants. <br />Williams asked about traffic on Summit View Drive. <br />Bair replied that most traffic would access the commercial portion from Highway 42. He <br />stated that the south access on Summit View had not changed from prior and would <br />allow people to go east off Kaylix. The north access was also in the same location as <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.