My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2009 04 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2009 04 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:23 PM
Creation date
6/12/2009 10:19:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCMIN 2009 04 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 20, 2009 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br /> <br />Lewis noted that Community Outreach is needed and should be a priority. She <br />suggested identifying immediate tasks. <br /> <br />Members liked the idea of monthly tasks that could be tracked and done more readily. <br /> <br />Members agreed that a Committee should be kept for the Old Town District. <br /> <br />Muckle suggested that the Commission continue work on a City GIS layer with historic <br />home information. <br /> <br />DiscussionlDirection/Action - Landmarking of Louisville Cemetery <br /> <br /> <br />Whiteman asked members to get outreach suggestions to staff by May 1. <br /> <br />Tofte moved to direct staff to begin work on a landmark application 0 <br />Cemetery. <br /> <br />Koertje seconded the motion. <br /> <br /> <br />s <br /> <br />All in favor. Staff will begin work on the application, <br /> <br />DiscussionlDirection/Action - Demolition Re <br /> <br />Stewart asked if he HPC should consider a fee for d <br /> <br />lition reviews. <br /> <br />Muth stated that some other cities charge for the review, but most do not. Of those that <br />charge, the charges generally chan ending on different stages in the process. <br /> <br /> <br />Lewis stated that one goal of requirin review is to keep the process positive and <br />that charging a fee could make it feel more negative. <br /> <br />Update on Demolition <br /> <br /> <br />revisited in the fall when some other items have been <br />able this until the fall. <br /> <br />Whiteman suggested t <br />completed. Members <br /> <br />Discussi <br /> <br /> <br />ents on Planning Department Referrals - None <br /> <br />Updates <br />1800 Plaza Ori", , the Hecla Casino Building - stay expired 4/19/09 <br />Lewis reported that she and Koertje continue to work on finding a new location for the <br />building. To that end Lewis will present the project at the May 5 City Council meeting to <br />help advertise the need for a new location. She is also contacting local non-profit groups <br />that may have an interest. <br /> <br />Jean Morgan, 1131 Spruce Street, suggested looking into the Mayhoffer Property or <br />Waneka Lake. <br /> <br />836 & 844 Main Street - stay expired 4/22/08 - None <br />824 South Place - stay expired 12/21/08 - None <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.