My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 06 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 06 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:13 PM
Creation date
6/12/2009 11:09:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2009 06 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 18, 2009 <br />Page 2 of 9 <br /> <br />interested in accepting the existing miner's cottage that was being slated for <br />demolition. Hancock was in the process of redeveloping the property and did not <br />want to demolish the house if it could be relocated to another location. <br /> <br />Affleck explained how she was able to work with Hancock during the relocation <br />process and gave a detailed report of archaeological items that were found on <br />the property once the structure was removed: a pair of shoes and a miner's <br />lamp. <br /> <br />Affleck expressed that she wished other homeowners wo <br />Hancock in ensuring that a historic structure could be s <br />that an emergency fund or some type of grant be esta <br />be moved rather that demolished. <br /> <br /> <br />work as diligently as <br />. She recommended <br />ed to allow houses to <br /> <br />Affleck also stated that she would share what <br />family who previously owned the structure. <br />family previously owned the house it alw <br /> <br /> <br />ial history she learns about the <br />stated when you ow what <br />.ves the house more acter. <br /> <br />Lewis asked if the moving estimates were a e after all was done. Affleck <br />answered the movers, Rocky Mountain Struct , was very professional and <br />actually adjusted the price to be competitive with he other firms being <br />considered. <br /> <br /> <br />d took a number of photos <br /> <br />Muckle stated that sh <br />to show the movin <br /> <br />Koertje stated he was happy that Carol <br />believes the Commission should set aside <br />situation <br /> <br />able to move the structure and <br />oney for an emergency fund for <br /> <br />Ste <br />ele <br />He sal <br />shored u <br />foundation <br /> <br /> <br />ated tha ese were great lessons learned for saving historical <br />such as all the interior materials that were saved during this process. <br />as amazing to watch how this structure "straightened up" when it was <br />e moved. It proves that sometimes all a structure needs is a good <br />most of the debilitating effects of aging. <br /> <br />e - 561 Lincoln Avenue <br /> <br />Whiteman gave background of what a Pre-filing Conference meeting is (this was <br />the first one for the HPC) and why the Commission is listening to this request. <br /> <br />Connie Lawrence, prospective owner of 561 Lincoln Avenue, presented to the <br />Commission what her and her husband are hoping to do with the property and <br />was hoping to receive some feedback from the Commission as to their thoughts. <br />Lawrence also mentioned that if they do demolish the existing structure that they <br />would build a sustainable building in its place. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.