My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 06 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 06 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:13 PM
Creation date
6/12/2009 11:09:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2009 06 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 18, 2009 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br /> <br />Muth presented the social history of the property. The social history explains that <br />this structure was the first building in the Acme Place subdivision, and was built <br />in the 1880's. <br /> <br />There wasn't any public comment. <br /> <br />Commission questions: <br /> <br />Whiteman asked how large is the property? <br /> <br />Andy Johnson, the architect for the project, responde <br />measures 114' X 75'. Johnson also stated that th <br />that it currently does not comply with the required <br /> <br /> <br />t the property <br />not that large and <br />. e and front). <br /> <br />Lawrence added there are also plenty of additions to the house t do not lend <br />to the historic nature of the building. <br /> <br />Johnson answered it is approxi <br /> <br /> <br />good shape and that <br />ouse. <br /> <br />Whiteman asked what is the size of the structure'2 <br /> <br />Lawrence stated that the interior 0 <br />they would consider reusing the inte <br /> <br />Lewis stated tha <br /> <br /> <br />ider the interior in regards to preservation. <br /> <br />Lawrence asked w <br />forward with this proj <br /> <br />recommend for them to move <br /> <br />Whiteman stated tha <br />a demolition permit p <br /> <br />ission could not give a full review until there was <br /> <br />Muth stated that there <br />to meet with Lawrence <br /> <br />the opportunity for the design assistance committee <br />iscuss her options. <br /> <br />Johnson added that <br />been removed. <br /> <br />of the windows have been replaced and the siding has <br /> <br />Muckle stated that she would love the visit the house with the applicant, but also <br />stated that she has been in the house before (she knows the owner) and realizes <br />that the house has asbestos siding and bad plumbing. <br /> <br />Whiteman commented on the contract to purchase the property. He reiterated <br />that there is no way for the Commission to prevent Lawrence form demolishing <br />the property. He then stated that the windows being removed might be an <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.