My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 06 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 06 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:13 PM
Creation date
6/12/2009 11:09:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2009 06 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 18, 2009 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br /> <br />impediment for the structure to be landmarked, but he also stated that the <br />Commission would do everything they could do to provide assistance. He stated <br />that Muckle could meet to discuss the interiors of the structure and Lewis could <br />meet to provide design assistance. <br /> <br />Stewart stated that trying to preserve a structure while providing energy saving <br />elements can be a tricky prospect, but Andy Johnson is a good resource for the <br />project. <br /> <br />Koertje added that he was glad that Lawrence was considering her options <br />before she demolished the structure. <br /> <br />Koertje added that there is now a historic preserv <br />Lawrence's project could be the, t project. <br /> <br /> <br />ove the <br /> <br />Johnson asked if the Commission if a structure co <br />preservation or landmark status if it were slightly <br /> <br />Muckle and Lewis stated that would not be a problem. <br />structure and replace it with a better foundation. <br /> <br />Discussion/Direction/Action - <br /> <br />ric Preservation Fund <br /> <br />Muth reminded the Commission that <br />goes before City Council on June 2, 2009. <br /> <br />toric Preservation Fund resolution <br /> <br />'""S)]qQqpP>'" <br /> <br />The Commissio <br />answered that ther <br />bank. <br /> <br /> <br />as any mq[1ey banked in the fund to date. Muth <br />t;.y $20,000 in the preservation fund <br /> <br />od, Planning Director, in the audience and asked <br />servation fund. <br /> <br />Wood an <br />In any way <br />the Downtown <br />meeting. <br /> <br />ed that the Planning Department is here to support the Commission <br />.ble. Wood then asked if the City Council was going to discuss <br />Handbook (design standards) at the June 2, 2009 <br /> <br />Muth answered that it was on the agenda for direction only. <br /> <br />Whiteman stated that the design guidelines should be revised because as the <br />fund begins to accrue, property owners will seek assistance and we should make <br />language in the design standards to provide for a design review committee (on <br />HPC). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.