My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2009 05 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2009 05 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:23 PM
Creation date
6/18/2009 11:08:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCMIN 2009 05 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 18, 2009 <br />Page 6 of 9 <br /> <br />Stewart began the discussion by stating they should discuss the categories that <br />will be involved in the awards: commercial and residential. The categories and <br />nominations are as follows: <br /> <br />Sensitive Additions <br />801 Lincoln Avenue <br />P reservati on/Restoration <br />Residential <br />1430 Front Street (formerly 1655 Main Street) <br />1001 Grant Avenue <br />637 Lincoln Avenue <br />1012 Lincoln Avenue <br />1145 Main Street <br />Commercial <br />740 Front Street - Old Louisville Inn <br />Adaptive Reuse <br />801 Main Street - State Mercantile Building <br />921 Main Street <br />Preservation of Historic Element <br />Pine Street Silo <br />Empire Restaurant Sign <br />Most Endangered Building <br />Louisville Grain Elevator - Front Street <br /> <br />Whiteman stated that he believed the Old Louisville Inn (OLl) should definitely be <br />landmarked. <br /> <br />Muckle asked what the Commission felt about 841 Lincoln for a residential <br />preservation award for sensitive additions? <br /> <br />Stewart stated that he believed 1041 Lincoln Avenue and 1008 Jefferson Avenue <br />should be considered for sensitive additions. <br /> <br />Lewis stated that 1008 Jefferson Avenue is a good example and 841 Lincoln is a <br />good example of a sensitive addition. However she did not believe 801 Lincoln <br />Avenue was a good example. <br /> <br />Muckle stated that 801 Lincoln had an addition on the side and was very well <br />done. She added that the brick cladding had been removed, but the contractor <br />covered up the original siding and did not include the important porch details. <br /> <br />Koertje added that the addition on 1041 Lincoln Avenue was not even visible. <br /> <br />Whiteman stated he was conflicted on 841 Lincoln Avenue, especially since the <br />front porch had been enclosed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.