My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1983 01 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1983 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1983 01 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:20 PM
Creation date
7/7/2009 4:40:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
1/18/1983
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1983 01 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1/18/83 <br /> <br />Page -26- <br /> <br />ments would go on record and would be pleased <br />to do the study with._the ~ooperationu of e~eryone. <br />involved, the fl=asibi1ity of the interchange <br />on U.S. 36. Mr. Farley is trusting that the <br />letter provided sufficient indication of <br />their interest in the matter so that when <br />Mayor Meier goes to the meeting to vote on <br />the issue, that portion would already <br />be cleared. <br /> <br />Mayor Meier Commented the only problem he had with the <br />letter was who 1fJaS going to fund the study, <br />and as to the exact date it will be accomplished. <br /> <br />APPROVE THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Mayor Meier moved, Councilman Fauson seconded <br />that council approve the transportation plan <br />with DRCOG's intention toward the feasibility <br />study. <br />Mayor Meier advised he had a copy of the <br />plan if any of the counci1members wished to <br />read it. <br /> <br />Councilman Leary Commented it was his feeling the letter <br />did not reflect what was asked in the motion <br />passed by council. The motion stated speci- <br />fically that we should have indication that <br />it is going to be in U.P.W.P., which would <br />then confirm who would pay for the study - <br />DRCOG. However, if other members felt it <br />was all right he would defer to their judge- <br />ment. <br />Director Rupp Remarked the the feeling he got when he spoke <br />with Dave Pampu was that they didn't want to <br />submit anything strictly to Louisville because <br />it is a joint type thing involving Broomfield <br />also. They also stated they could not include <br />it in the plan without taking it back to the <br />T.A.C. and other committees, and it was com- <br />ing up for adoption by January 19, 1983. <br />Mr. Pampu was asking if this letter would be, <br />at this time, an indication of their expressed <br />desire to work with us. However, the fund- <br />ing was not discussed as they would like to <br />be certain that the County and Broomfield <br />are in agreement. <br />Councilman Leary Remarked the Unified Planning Work Program <br />is just a document that says these are the <br />studies we are going to do this year and the <br />planning activities we are going to engage in <br />and this is how many F.T.E. are going to be <br />commited to doing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.