Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilman Leary <br />Scheduled meetings <br /> <br />City Administrator's Evaluation <br />& Goals - September 28, 1982 <br /> <br />Budget <br /> <br />Chamber of Commerce Meeting <br /> <br />Lafayette Suit <br /> <br />9/7/82 <br /> <br />Page -15- <br /> <br />Councilman Cussen expressed his displeasure <br />with the report and the system. Suggested <br />this be pursued further. <br /> <br />Wished clarification on schedule of meetings. <br />AdministratorWurl advised the September 9th <br />meeting had been cancelled - buget meetings <br />were rescheduled for September 20, 22, 28, 1982. <br />September 30, 1982 joint meeting with the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Wished to know the date this would be discussed. <br />Mayor Meier stated the Goals policy had been <br />set up for September 28, 1982; also this <br />may not be needed for budget. <br />Leary stated, personally. he did not like <br />to see this meeting delayed or done after <br />the budget process. Felt it related to the <br />budget process and some decisions may be made <br />that could change the budget. He suggested <br />that an additional date besides Sept. 28th <br />be set aside in the event the budget is not <br />complete. <br />Administrator Wurl advised the public hearing <br />for the budget is scheduled for October 19, <br />1982. He further advised the budget should <br />be completed as early as possible in October <br />to have it in final form for the public <br />hearing, possibly no later than Oct. 7th. <br />Leary inquired if there would still be time <br />in October to have another budget session. <br />Wurl replied yes. <br /> <br />Councilman Leary spoke with Mr. Bianchi <br />and felt the meeting would be very worthwhile <br />and informative~. He was concerned until Council <br />and Planning Commission had met on the Comp <br />Plan it would be rather difficult for staff <br />to respond to some of the questions. <br /> <br />Again was concerned that he found out, after <br />it had been done, the suit that Mr. William- <br />son had filed against Lafayette. It was his <br />feeling that it is inappropriate that any <br />attorney does these things without consulting <br />his clients first, as a matter of principle. <br />Further the suit may be very valid and the <br />only way the City can go but he felt the <br />City should be suing nobody without the policy <br />board of the City making that decision. He <br />really felt distributed by the fact there is <br />an unstated goal by trying to improve relations <br />with our neighboring municipalities. It was <br /> <br />his feeling that if the right people got <br />