My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1982 06 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1982 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1982 06 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:19 PM
Creation date
7/8/2009 4:28:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/15/1982
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1982 06 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT <br />RESOLUTION 1122 '"' SERIES 1982 <br />NEODATA FINAL PLAT <br />COUNCIL MEEI~NG, JUNE 15, 1982 <br /> <br />Attorney Rautenstraus re~d Resolution 1122 - "Series 1982 - Final,Plat <br /> <br />of the A. C. Nielsen - Neodata Subdivision in .its entirety. <br />\ - <br /> <br />Director. <br /> <br />',-1.'- . .." <br /> <br />of Community Development Rupp gave a slide presentation of the proposal,. <br />'and the Mayor and Councilmembers had copies of alltheperti.nent infor- <br /> <br />~ ;~ <br /> <br />mation. Rupp advis,ed that there had been several ~tings. ,thatnad t,aken <br />... .' ',:..... ."'" . """ <br /> <br />pl~ce between area residents, the City, and thedeveIiopers of She p~oposed~ <br /> <br />in . .. .......-' ""-~""~~ ..":;:: .~; <br /> <br />Neodata development .He had'beenj attendance at two of the meet;:~i.ngs in the . <br />City Conference Room and they went ovei'a number df' subj ects. '- W?9.se sub- <br />ject matters that had been discussed dealt with the landscapi.ng:plan, <br />phase II improvements to South Boulder Road, dedication of the open space,etc. <br />as outlined in the subdivision agreement. That agreement has been included <br />and it has been signed by the developers and submitted to the City Council, <br />as a part of the plat requirements. In addition to that they have supplied <br />Exhibit A which details the costs of some o.f~the improvements which <br />they are required to do. It also includes the fact that we have a separate <br /> <br />agreement that addresses the issue of landscaping, etc. and the surety <br /> <br />bond that they will put up for thOse types of improvements. This evening <br />what is basically before the Council and has been before the Planning <br />Commission is the matter of the subdivision plat, and that is what has' been <br /> <br />reviewed. The' recommendation of the Planning Commission was for approval - <br /> <br />df the plat. They did request that some conditions be pl..aced on their <br />1.pproval, and it was included in Resolution 1120- Series 1'982_. The. first <br />condition placed on it was that there be joint access with Neodata and <br /> <br />LDS Church property which is to the east, but divided by a 75' ft. pu1i1:fc'; \ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.