My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1982 06 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1982 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1982 06 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:19 PM
Creation date
7/8/2009 4:28:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/15/1982
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1982 06 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Page -9- <br />~owlton: Dennis Knowlton I 955 W, Plum of Louisville, I would to also <br />thank you for allowing me to come in and speak with you. The Neodata <br />thing, I think caught the residents up on the Mesa, kinda by surprise, <br />and the protest against it was slow in developing because we didn't <br />quite understand what was going on and were kinda surprised. Since <br />we have found out, there have been 2 petitions past - I don't know if <br />they have been presented to the Council. I know one of them is going <br />to be. There has been fairly large attendance at Neodata's presenta- <br />tion of April 24th and there was a large attendance at the Planning <br />Commission on May 11th. People was - it was a kind of a public hearing <br />type of thing, although it wasn't billed as such. Several people spoke <br />out against it. I'm against the thing - but these things cause me to <br />think what can we do as citizens to try and sway this thing - try and <br />ut it off. I know people's opinions don't change quickly. So uh we <br />need to present some good arguments. My question is - is like it has <br />been stated here - this large industry is not compatible with residential <br />area. I live up there. If you lived up there, I'm sure you would share <br />these feelings. ~ht's wrong - where do we look for the solution to this? <br />It keeps coming back to the zoning - office zoning. In the Planning Com- <br />mission it was made very, very clear to us that they were considering the <br />technicalities of Neodata's presentation. The City Attorney was asked <br />to rule on the use of the zoning. Dh - he's not likely to change his mind <br />quickly so he stuck by his original view that it was in compliance. I <br />have a grave, grave question on that. The zoning states that there are <br />personal bussinesses going in - personal services. It even gives ex- <br />1mples of these personal services. A small animal clinic was one of <br />the things that was mentioned - uh doctors, dentists, attorneys - these <br /> <br />kind of things where the traffic coming in is kind of uniform during the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.