My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1982 01 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1982 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1982 01 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:19 PM
Creation date
7/9/2009 3:23:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
1/5/1982
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1982 01 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1/5/82 <br /> <br />Page -8- <br /> <br />COUNCIL COHMENTS <br />Councilman Cummings <br /> <br />Questioned if all the material submitted <br />in the packet for Royal Food Mart needed to <br />be enclosed. Suggested that perhaps a summary <br />could be made of all the necessary documents <br />and the Attorney's statement that it was in <br />order. <br />Attorney Rautenstraus advised should there <br />ever be any question about the establishment, <br />it was best all the information be submitted <br />to Council in the event someone opposed the <br />application. <br /> <br />SPEED LIMIT SIGN ON FRONT <br />STREET <br /> <br />Directed his inquiry to City Engineer Blan- <br />chard - in October did we not propose a <br />20 MPH Speed Li.mit Sign on Front St. <br />Blanchard advised this would be incorporated <br />with the updated Hodel Traffic Code which <br />should be before Council soon. <br /> <br />Councilman Brown <br />Parks & Rec. Fees <br /> <br />Administrator Wurl <br /> <br />It was his opinion that the out-of-city <br />residents should pay l~ times the rate of <br />the city residents. <br />Director Hioco advised at present the out-of- <br />city residents do pay $2.00 more than in city. <br />He also stated that most classes are filled <br />with both in and out-of-city residenis and <br />perhaps if the fees were raised the classes <br />would not be filled. Hioco advised that <br />the fees were structured as those of Broom- <br />field and Boulder; however if the fees were <br />raised at a later date the out-of-city resi- <br />dents would be assessed f'i.rst. <br />Councilman Brown moved that out-of-city <br />residents be charged l~ times the fees charged <br />for in-city residents. Seconded by Councilman <br />Cummings. <br /> <br />Inquired of Director Hioco if the programs <br />pay for themselves at the present time. <br />Hioco advised they did and in some cases <br />realize a small profit. <br /> <br />MOTION TO RAISE FEES <br /> <br />Councilman Brown <br /> <br />Inquired what percentage of the classes are <br />out-of-city residents. <br />The reply was 10% and the increase would not <br />have a great effect on the participation. <br />It was Hioco's opinion that the fees were <br />in line with those of the surrounding areas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.