My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1981 11 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1981 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1981 11 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:18 PM
Creation date
7/14/2009 2:32:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
11/17/1981
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1981 11 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />11/17/81 <br /> <br />Page -5- <br /> <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S <br />REPORT <br />TRI-CITY ANNEX OFFICES <br /> <br />Each member of council had a copy of a <br />letter from Boulder County along with a <br />copy of the proposed budget for the Tri- <br />City Annex Office in Louisville. Boulder <br />County was requesting Council allocate <br />$4,000 for 1982 as our contribution to <br />keep the annex operating. Administrator <br />Wurl remarked the annex was a real con- <br />venience for our residents since they <br />did not have to drive to Boulder. <br />He infoDued Council previously Lafayette <br />had rejected participating; however they <br />were reconsidering this at their council <br />meeting this evening. Apparently Broom- <br />field has rejected the County's request <br />for funding, but he was unable to get <br />information from the County what the re- <br />sult of this ~ould be. <br /> <br />Hayor Caranci <br /> <br />Inquired since the $4,000 is for 1982, <br />wouldn't it be the responsibility of the <br />new Council to approve this expenditure. <br /> <br />Councilman Cummings <br /> <br />Administrator Wurl advised this money has <br />been allocated in 1982 city budget and the <br />County needs to know as soon as possible <br />as they are in the budget process. <br />He then stated that if Council approves <br />the request and the other cities do not <br />participate; obviously Louisville will not <br />pay their share. <br /> <br />Inquired if Lafayette and Broomfield do not <br />participate, will Louisville be asked to <br />pick up the remaining 2/3rds of the request. <br /> <br />Mr. Wurl advised he was unable to get this <br />information from the County. <br /> <br />Councilman Fauson <br /> <br />Inquired which portion of the budget the <br />County vms funding - wages for the personnel, <br />or the lease on the building. <br />Wurl advised the total budget was $28,000 <br />and the County was funding the difference <br />between $28,000 and $12,000 or $16,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.