Laserfiche WebLink
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />May 11, 2022 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />Commissioners discussed the project timeline as well as the applicant's desire <br />to preserve the first 25 feet of the building as historic. Commissioner Smith <br />suggested it will be important to obtain the detail of the work completed under <br />this funding. <br />Chair Adler called for public comment; there was none. <br />Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve the application with Tebo <br />Partnership LLLP. Councilmember Smith seconded. <br />Roll call vote: <br />Commissioner Smith - yes <br />Councilmember Leh - yes <br />Chair Adler - yes <br />Commissioner Harald - yes <br />Commissioner Tofte - yes <br />Commissioner Williams - yes <br />Motion passes <br />• Discussion/Direction- Commission Logo Concepts <br />Director Pierce said at a previous meeting the LRC discussed developing a logo <br />and additional marketing materials. She took feedback from April and returned <br />to graphic designer; the revised options created are presented in the packet. <br />Commissioners discussed the logos and each shared perspectives. The <br />general preference was for the circular logo design with the dark blue that <br />makes more of an impact. <br />Chair Adler called for public comment. Mark Cathcart suggested not picking a <br />logo until seeing it in a black and white version, which might frequently be used <br />over a full color version. <br />Commissioners agreed the logos did not need to return for additional <br />discussion, but Director Pierce will share final versions via email. <br />• Discussion/ Direction — Work Plan <br />Director Pierce noted the commissioner is waiting for DCI outcomes to provide <br />a long-term action plan. Comments during that time do not need to be limited to <br />what is on the Work Plan; Commissioners should think broadly and bigger <br />Agenda Packet P. 8 <br />