My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2022 06 23
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2022 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2022 06 23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2022 10:15:22 AM
Creation date
7/7/2022 9:25:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/23/2022
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 09, 2022 <br />Page 8 of 14 <br />b. The proposal includes two additional multi -family structures that match the <br />existing Delo Apartments and are compatible with the surrounding area. <br />3. That the use/development is adequate for the internal efficiency of the proposal, <br />considering the functions of residents, recreation, public access, safety and such <br />factors including storm drainage facilities, sewage and water facilities, grades, <br />dust control, and such other factors directly related to public health and <br />convenience. <br />a. The development provides adequate access points and provides for future <br />connections to anticipated redevelopment to the east. <br />b. Cannon St. and Griffith St. pedestrian experience will be improved through <br />the construction of the detached walk and tree lawn. <br />c. The development corrects a known drainage issue by regrading and <br />directing water to appropriate detention areas. <br />4. That external effects of the proposal are controlled, considering compatibility of <br />land use; movement or congestion of traffic; services, including arrangement of <br />signs and lighting devices as to prevent the occurrence of nuisances; <br />landscaping and other similar features to prevent the littering or accumulation of <br />trash, together with other factors deemed to affect public health, welfare, safety <br />and convenience. <br />a. The development includes appropriately designed lighting, landscaping, <br />and site amenities. <br />b. With the proposed condition, limits are placed on exterior hours of <br />operation and amplified music to reasonable times. <br />c. Improves the current condition of the property, which is in disrepair. <br />The final plat proposes to consolidate Lots 1-9 and Tracts A, B, and C into one lot. The <br />applicant complies with all standards in Title 16, and city council will consider easement <br />vacations to align with the new development. <br />Staff Recommendations: <br />Staff recommends that the commission approve this application with the following <br />conditions: <br />1. The hours of operation for amenity areas and amplifies music be from 7:OOam <br />through 10:00pm, seven days per week. <br />2. Amend the PUD to require a black coated chain link fence around the pickleball <br />court. <br />Commissioner Questions of Staff: <br />Diehl asks if the plan for the outdoor amenity space was going to be roughly 9500 sq ft. <br />Ritchie says the staff report has the numbers but the areas are smaller. <br />Diehl asks if staff thought about having a traffic study conducted. <br />Ritchie says staff did not request a traffic study. The increase of a couple dozen units is <br />not enough to affect the surrounding area in a significant manner. <br />Howe asks where Maria Lane is. <br />Ritchie says it will be the most northern private drive running east and west. <br />Howe asks how that lane will be used. <br />Ritchie says it is intended to be used as a vehicle access for the private residents. <br />Osterman asks about the access road that connects Cannon to Highway 42. If this is <br />approved, is that a done deal? <br />01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.