My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2022 06 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
ECONOMIC VITALITY COMMITTEE
>
2022 Economic Vitality Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2022 06 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2022 9:58:33 AM
Creation date
7/7/2022 9:30:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/17/2022
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: BUSINESS SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS <br />DATE: JUNE 17, 2022 PAGE 2 OF 5 <br />2017 and 2018 survey outcomes. In future years, a number of these questions can be <br />presented to provide trend analysis. <br />Business Satisfaction Survey Question Responses <br />Overall, 54.69% of respondents (35) said that the City of Louisville is not a friendly place <br />to do business; only 31.25% of respondents (20) said they thought it was a friendly <br />place to do business. Compared to three years ago, 43.75% of respondents (28), said <br />the current environment was worse for doing business compared to 3 years ago. A total <br />of 17 respondents indicated there had been no change in the environment in 3 years, <br />but they were split as to whether the environment was "Poor" (17.19%) or "Good" <br />(9.38%). <br />The majority of respondents (36.51 %, 23) also indicated they were "Unlikely" to <br />recommend the City of Louisville as a place to do business. However, 19.05% of <br />respondents (12) said they were very likely to recommend the community as a place to <br />do business. Respondents were then asked to indicate their agreement with several <br />statements about doing business locally. The majority of businesses said they <br />"Disagree" that Louisville provides "Ease for Getting Business Done" (29.69%) and <br />"Cost of Doing Business" (34.92%). The majority also "Strongly Disagree" with the "Cost <br />of Housing for Employees" (34.38%). Most respondents, however, "Agree" that "Retail <br />Amenities are Sufficient (33.33%). <br />Respondents indicated they use a wide variety of sources to get information about the <br />City of Louisville. The most used sources include the City Community Update <br />newsletter, local news outlets, and the Louisville Biz newsletter. Although in a slightly <br />different order, these are the same top three sources that people prefer to use to get <br />information. <br />Respondents were asked to describe both the importance of and satisfaction with <br />factors that cause a business to locate in Louisville. The most important factors to <br />businesses included: "Proximity to customers" (53.85%), "Availability of utilities & <br />infrastructure" (51.06%), "Physical appearance of area" (43.14%), "Attitude of city <br />toward businesses" (43.14%), and "Safety & Security" (41.67%). Ideally, the most <br />important factors are the ones with which respondents are most satisfied. Respondents <br />indicated the most satisfaction with the following factors: "Access to highways" <br />(62.50%), "Safety & security" (56.10%), "Proximity to home" (55.81 %), "Physical <br />appearance of area" (54.76%), and "Availability of commercial property" (52.38%). <br />The survey also asked respondents to evaluate their satisfaction with City services. The <br />majority of respondents were "Satisfied" with "Quality of snow removal" (53.97%), "Flow <br />of traffic & traffic management" (49.21 %), and "Quality of public safety services" <br />(48.39%). Respondents said they were "Very Dissatisfied" with services such as "Value <br />for taxes & fees" (25.40%) and "Management of City finances" (14.29%). The majority, <br />42.86% of respondents, said they were "Satisfied" with the "Overall quality of services", <br />Agenda Packet P. 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.