Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 5, 2022 <br />Page 4 of 10 <br />structures was removed as it requires review from the Planning Commission. That section <br />will come back to Council for consideration as a separate ordinance on May 3. <br />Director Zuccaro stated that Ordinance No. 1826 would repeal the requirement for <br />residential sprinklers in all homes in the city. The Fire District is recommending the <br />Council consider putting in an opt out option for sprinklers only for fire affected properties <br />rather than a full repeal of the requirement. <br />Public Comments <br />Marc Cathcart, Sweet Clover Lane, stated he opposes Ordinance No. 1826 as he feels all <br />homes in Louisville should have sprinklers. All homes that were built since the sprinkler <br />required installed them with no problem. Homes are safer with them. His research found <br />no complaints about putting in sprinklers since it was put in the code. <br />Josh Cooperman, 216 Griffith Street, stated he does not support Ordinance No. 1825. <br />These building codes are the best way to address climate change which is a clear crisis. <br />He stated the incentives look to be sufficient to address the costs. He noted the need for <br />local action to address climate warming and urged a no vote. <br />Chief John Willson, 895 Via Appia Way, stated the Fire District does not support <br />Ordinance No. 1826. He stated most of the comments he has seen since the fire are <br />looking for an option to opt out of the sprinkler requirement not a full repeal of the <br />requirement. He added the cost of the sprinklers is about the same as the cost of the <br />additional work that is needed in walls to meet the code if there are no sprinklers. He <br />urged a no vote for the safety of the community. <br />Larry Donner, 1020 Willow Place, urged Council to support Ordinance No. 1825. <br />Don Clay, 557 Augusta Lane, stated the fire was not officially linked to climate change so <br />that should not be considered. <br />Christian Dino thanked council for considering the option to opt out of the new code to <br />help those underinsured. He urged a yes vote. <br />Mayor Stolzmann asked for Council comments; seeing none she asked for the second <br />round of public comments. <br />Public Comments — None. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated he supports Ordinance No. 1825 as it provides two paths <br />for those rebuilding. For anyone who may have been underinsured, building to the 2018 <br />code may be the only way they can rebuild. For others the option to build to the 2021 <br />more strict code is still available and may help people use Ordinance & Law coverage. <br />