My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1981 05 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1981 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1981 05 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:18 PM
Creation date
7/20/2009 10:24:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
5/5/1981
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1981 05 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilman DelPizzo <br /> <br />Councilman Cummings <br /> <br />ORDINANCE #717 - STAGGERED <br />TERMS DEFEATED <br /> <br />ORDINANCE #718 - UPDATING <br />LOUISVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE <br />TITLES 1 THRU 9 - 2ND READING <br /> <br />5/5/81 <br /> <br />Page - 5 - <br /> <br />fill a vacancy - this does happen, and <br />looking over a two year period, if this <br />was extended over a four year. period it might <br />be possible that almost every member of <br />Council that had been elected could be <br />replaced by appointments. Therefore, <br />in his opinion was not a good alternative. <br /> <br />Concurred with Councilman Heier stating <br />that a tvvo year term was sufficient. <br /> <br />Conrrnented on the remarks made by Council- <br />man Meier as relates to appointments and <br />agreed with this aspect. However, he <br />supported staggered terms for continuity <br />stating that the City is growing and there <br />are many pending projects and continuity <br />would be important in making decisions. <br />If an entire new council is elected they <br />would be unaware of the legal procedural <br />points involved in the decision making, <br />It was his opinion that time would be lost <br />and there would be much repetition in the <br />process. He also stated that perhaps Council <br />should have some discussion and find out <br />what the citizens of Louisville want to <br />do about a referendum vote on terms. <br /> <br />There being no further remarks, Mayor <br />Caranci asked for a roll call vote on <br />the motion. <br />Domenico <br />Fauson <br />Cummings <br />lvIeier <br />DelPizzo <br />Motion defeated 4-l. <br />Hayor Caranci reprimanded the members of <br />Council :Ear not doing their homework. It <br />was his opinion that it should have been <br />defeated on first reading saving the cost <br />of publication. <br /> <br />No <br />No <br />Yes <br />No <br />No <br /> <br />Attorney Joss read the ordinance by title <br />only. He then requested that Council con- <br />sider an amendment before adopting the <br />ordinance, and referred to page 3, section <br />2.72.030 Payroll Deduction. The State <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.