My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2022 10 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2022 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2022 10 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2022 4:52:06 PM
Creation date
10/27/2022 1:27:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
10/18/2022
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
10/27/2022 1:28 PM
Modified:
10/27/2022 1:28 PM
Text:
http://www.louisvilleco.gov/
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LEauisi'uyi � �111e Department of Planning and Building Safety <br />L <br />C01.01".%P -SIN E. 749 Main Street # Louisville CO 80027 # 303.335.4592 # www.LouisvilleCO.aov <br />Dino stated that since Xcel is already implementing old infrastructure in the Marshall Fire burn area where they <br />know we have passed the 2021 IECC for residential and are still choosing to implement old infrastructure. <br />Betshold-indicated that Xcel has told the City of Louisville that they are planning on providing infrastructure to <br />allow the ability for 320 Amp service for each home. <br />Geise said that without the infrastructure in place in Colorado, the cost of electric will be more expensive if <br />Colorado has to pay for electricity outside the state in order to meet the demand here if we require all electric. <br />Dino expressed that he has trying to get Xcel Energy to provide temporary power on site for the rebuild and the <br />contractors working for Xcel have told him that Xcel has already issued purchase orders for transformers that do <br />not meet the requirements that Betshold said they will provide. Dino further expressed that he does not believe <br />that Xcel will provide the infrastructure until it fails. <br />Betshold said she would work with City staff on the issue. <br />Schlaepfer stated Xcel hasn't been given any directive from that shows they will require all -electric. <br />Geise asked for clarification of why one business owner who owns four restaurants would be given more of a <br />break than another who has a large warehouse with distribution, even if the square footage is the same for <br />both. <br />McCollough responded that with their policy research that the technology for restaurants to use all -electric is <br />not readily available or cost effective, so that industrial and restaurants would not be as strict as other types. <br />Geise expressed concern that the building requirements cannot be sustained or that an owner would need all <br />available space to meet solar requirements and standards. McCollough agreed that the Appendix CC <br />implementation would be difficult to meet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.