Laserfiche WebLink
LEauisi'uyi � �111e Department of Planning and Building Safety <br />L <br />C01.01".%P -SIN E. 749 Main Street # Louisville CO 80027 # 303.335.4592 # www.LouisvilleCO.aov <br />Dino expressed concern over the residential implementation and disagreed with the choice to implement it as it <br />was decided. Dino further explained that the document that was presented to City Council in 2021 as a <br />collaboration between the BCBOA and City staff did not represent their ideas. He explained that he does not <br />support this code adoption because the infrastructure is not there, Louisville has already lost some businesses to <br />adjacent communities. <br />Dino suggested the group take a straw vote as whether or not they would approve of the general adoption of <br />the 2021 IECC for Commercial and that if the City adopts the code it is against the recommendation of the <br />BCBOA. Knapp seconded. <br />Berry asked if there were any votes for recommending the 2021 IECC Commercial code. Gatto voted yes with <br />recommendations. Berry asked which members vote to not adopt any of it. Berry and Dino voted no. Giese <br />would like to see the rest of the slides. <br />Lane interrupted to clarify that the purpose of the meeting wasn't to have any official vote but just to present <br />information to the Board. <br />Berry clarified that it was just a straw poll to understand which members agree with the overall adoption of any <br />portion of the IECC commercial code. Berry added that with reference to the 2021 IECC residential code <br />adoption in October of 2021 that Appendix RC was never given to the Board for consideration and was a major <br />change but was presented as if the BCBOA had agreed with it so their trust for the process is damaged and that <br />their comments are accurately presented to City Council. <br />Dino added that when City Council adopted Appendix RC that it created a moratorium on new building permits <br />for over a month and if the BCBOA had been asked in their an advisory role they could have advised as to how to <br />adopt it without issues. <br />Berry noted that he has several projects that are waiting on Xcel equipment. Giese also added he has a project <br />where he has been waiting on Xcel for six months on a meter set for a commercial building. <br />