My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2022 11 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2022 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2022 11 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2022 5:29:02 PM
Creation date
11/15/2022 12:16:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
11/9/2022
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />October 12, 2022 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />minutes, be presented to City Council on November 1, 2022 and return to the LRC for final <br />approval on November 9, 2022. <br />There was an interruption to Internet service and the meeting paused until services were <br />restored at 8: 31 am. <br />2023 beginning fund balance is $2,918.799. Staff proposes increasing the Fagade <br />Improvement Program to $300K and included funding for four capital projects that were <br />proposed during the September meeting. The City Manager noted that close attention was <br />paid to the last LRC meeting and the LRC/City Council joint meeting while discussing <br />recommendations for the budget with DCI and developing this proposed budget. LRC funding <br />can help with projects that were under the CIP fund which fall under the URA definitions to <br />reduce the time to complete projects and increase the success with getting contractors and <br />bids with bigger contracts. <br />Chair Adler called for commissioner questions. <br />Commissioner Smith proposed the commission start with the nine items on the budget that <br />are able to change. <br />URA Marketing Strategy <br />Commissioner Williams asked for clarification on what this funding is to be used for. <br />This funding is for public outreach and communications. Councilmember Leh asked for <br />clarification on the process to amend the budget after it's approved. The City Attorney <br />said the amendment process is similar to the approval process — a request comes from <br />the LRC and is reviewed and approved by City Council, returning to LRC for final <br />acceptance. <br />There was a discussion on renaming the budget line item to cover project strategy and <br />modify the amount budgeted for this line item. Chair Adler said that consulting services <br />are needed to determine what the project strategy should be and the process for <br />identifying projects. Councilmember Leh suggested using the language discussed in <br />the joint LRC/City Council meeting and not be limited by the assumptions Council may <br />make about CIP and the General Fund. Council has given LRC discretion on how to <br />manage the budget. <br />Commissioner Smith mentioned that special project identification will come from the <br />DCI report, which has 5-6 catalytic projects and spend the marketing strategy funding <br />on public outreach for these projects. There will also be a 10% programming effort to <br />get costing and project plans put in place for 2023 for project execution in 2024. <br />Agenda Packet P. 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.