Laserfiche WebLink
Commission, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed subdivision does not <br />promote the following purposes set forth in Section 16.04.020 of the Louisville Municipal <br />Code ("LMC"), or comply with the following standards set forth in LMC Chapter 16.16 <br />and this title: <br />A. The Planning Commission finds that the application from Sterling Bay (the <br />"Applicant") for approval of the Redtail Ridge Filing No. 1 Preliminary and <br />Final Subdivision Plat (the "Application") does not comply with LMC Sec. <br />16.16.010.D. and E., which states that natural features and vegetation must <br />be preserved to the extent possible and a need for additional open space may <br />be based on vegetation and the type and density of the propose <br />development. The Applicant has not demonstrated that the proposed <br />subdivision adequately preserves natural features, wildlife habitat and <br />vegetation of the property. Previously undeveloped areas on the northern <br />portion of the property include natural vegetation that could be further <br />preserved as public or private open space with clustering of the development <br />lots to the south. <br />B. The Planning Commission finds that the Application does not comply with <br />LMC Sec. 16.04.020.K, which states the purpose of a subdivision is to avoid <br />traffic congestion, based on the following: <br />According to the traffic study submitted with the Application, the US 36 <br />and Northwest Parkway interchange reaches a Level of Service F and <br />would need modified by the year 2027-2028 to provide additional <br />vehicular capacity to accommodate the proposed subdivision. The <br />Application does not include proposals for mitigation, road capacity <br />work, or contribution to future road capacity work for the interchange, <br />nor are future improvements planned at this time. <br />2. The Application does not include a commitment from Northwest <br />Parkway Authority for the acquisition of right of way needed to <br />construct road capacity improvements included in the traffic study as <br />needed to mitigate traffic congestion. <br />C. The Planning Commission finds that the Application does not comply with <br />LMC Sec. 16.16.040 concerning block length, as some blocks proposed in <br />the Application exceed the maximum length of 1,320 feet. Although the <br />Applicant requested a modification pursuant to LMC Chapter 16.24 to allow <br />longer block lengths, the Commission does not find that there are unique <br />physical or topographical circumstances or conditions to justify the <br />modification. Maintaining prescribed block lengths is necessary to ensure an <br />adequate and convenient transportation system to serve the proposed <br />subdivision. <br />