My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Sustainability Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 04 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
SUSTAINABILITY ADVISORY BOARD
>
2023 Sustainability Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Sustainability Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 04 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2023 2:46:47 PM
Creation date
4/17/2023 2:04:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/19/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Sustainability Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />March 15, 2023 <br />Page 5 of 10 <br />He noted that Louisville has lost lots of businesses in the last several years. He <br />stated that Louisville should have the attitude that all businesses are welcome. <br />He also stated that the ordinance would reduce property owners' rights by not <br />allowing them to develop their property in certain ways. He suggested that the <br />free market will dictate what businesses are necessary in Louisville. He also <br />suggested that the ordinance might be too late with the City having already <br />allowed six gasoline stations to locate in Louisville. He concluded by stating that <br />restricting the types and numbers of businesses is dangerous. <br />Ted McDonald, an engineer, noted that gasoline costs considerably less at the <br />Superior Costco. He expressed a concern about the ordinance leading to a loss <br />of competition between gasoline stations. Since Louisville residents drive to <br />stores in nearby towns, he suggested that improved mass transit would be <br />beneficial, especially the planned train line to Boulder and Longmont. <br />Cathern Smith stated that she strongly supports limiting gasoline stations in <br />Louisville. She was initially skeptical of this effort but came to support the effort <br />after learning about the negative health impacts from gasoline station emissions. <br />She noted that California has mandated buffer zones around gasoline stations <br />but that these buffers are insufficient to protect the surrounding areas from air <br />pollution. She also expressed her concern about the environmental impacts of <br />gasoline stations. She noted that property owners near gasoline stations have <br />rights as well and that gas stations and convenience stores have been found to <br />diminish nearby property values. She stated that the exception for a gasoline <br />station associated with a marketplace development does not align with the City's <br />friendliness to small businesses, that such a gasoline station would outcompete <br />smaller gasoline stations, and that such developments are not compatible with <br />the City's small town character. <br />Michiko inquired about the difference between gasoline service stations and <br />automobile service stations. Rob clarified that gasoline and automobile service <br />stations are the same type of entities but that the latter term is used in the City's <br />planned community zone districts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.