Laserfiche WebLink
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />April 12, 2023 <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />useful. She wondered whether sharing OSAB's onboarding process with the council or <br />other boards might be helpful. Helen observed how at the Sales Tax Task Force, the <br />board members on the task force have far more seniority and history with the tax than <br />the staff members on the task force, who are all recent hires. Ember said that the <br />existence and role of OSAB is written into the City charter and cannot be canceled, but <br />her understanding is that it could consume another board's duties. David pointed out that <br />the Council has prioritized adding board members with a greater diversity of viewpoints <br />as a part of its EDI goals. Shrinking the boards and reducing the number of members <br />seems to be in conflict with that goal. Jessamine asked Susan what she thought had <br />been the Council's overall impetus for this discussion. Susan said that her impression <br />was that Council thought there were too many boards and inconsistencies in how they <br />are run. Ember added that since boards want Council liaisons again, that all the boards <br />mean there are a lot of meetings for Council members to attend. <br />Susan was also at the Council meeting two weeks ago. Meredyth sent all boards an <br />email outlining norms and expectations about running board meetings as a result of this <br />meeting. Susan also reported that she learned at this meeting that the name of OSAB <br />cannot be changed without a citizen vote. Ember added that there is a new rule no <br />longer requiring the addresses of the public who comment at meetings. This was a <br />security concern. Now members of the public who speak at board and commission <br />meetings must simply give their name and whether or not they live in Louisville. Ember <br />also mentioned that the City might set some recommendations for levels of detail in the <br />meeting minutes, which led to a brief discussion about the pros and cons of the extreme <br />level of detail in OSAB minutes. <br />10. Discussion Item: Sales & Use Tax Force Updates. Presented by Jessamine <br />Fitzpatrick and Helen Moshak <br />Helen and Jessamine have attended three meetings of the Open Space and Parks <br />Sales & Use Tax Task Force. They wrote up a small packet to share with the board <br />giving minutes from the meetings and background information about the tax. The packet <br />will be included as an addendum to the April 2023 Meeting Packet. <br />Helen and Jessamine pointed out a few items from the packet. The task force came up <br />with a few options for the tax, including: increasing the tax rate, removing the sunset for <br />the tax or changing its term, and specifying program dedications in the language of the <br />ballot, and maintaining the status quo. The City has hired a local, Louisville polling firm <br />to poll citizens about these four options before the ballot language is set. The next <br />meeting of the task force will be in May to review the results of the polling. In June/July <br />the Council will formalize the language for the ballot in November. The task force set <br />priorities for the polling questions and will review them before they go out. Jessamine <br />said they might be allowed to share the questions with the board, but certainly would be <br />able to share out the results of the poll. <br />The minutes also include some information about how neighboring municipalities tax <br />their citizens and fund their open space and how funds are spent from the Louisville <br />fund. David asked whether the current 2:1 ratio of funding to parks to open space is <br />typical of other municipalities. Helen said it was hard to know, as that information seems <br />not to be generally available. She added that in the City of Lafayette, the split is closer to <br />50:50, as mandated by their separate taxes. Jessamine said she has the impression that <br />