Laserfiche WebLink
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />May 10, 2023 <br />Page 8 of 12 <br />Jojo pointed out that removing pine needles and mulch might be harmful, as they provide <br />habitat for wildlife and help with soil water retention. Dr. Matonis pointed out that mulch <br />under trees can act as a fuel during the winter, but in the summer, mulch retains moisture <br />and may reduce fire risk. She used this as an example of the complexity of fire mitigation. <br />Helen asked about the mitigation potential of some of the new hybrid buffalo grasses that <br />stay low and are related to native species. Dr. Matonis didn't have any information about <br />them. <br />Helen was surprised and concerned that open space was ranked third in the "relative <br />importance" part of the wildfire risk mode and asked if this ranking took into account # <br />of users, # of acres, # of partnerships with neighboring governments, # of points of contact <br />with residents and land owners, etc., She felt that the public would want an explanation <br />of this. David thought it might reflect some sort of cost of replacement consideration. Mr. <br />Szafranski said these relative importance numbers came from their evaluation, not the <br />City. Laura pointed out that there are surveys that rank open space as the most popular <br />city amenity to the citizen, so data about how citizens' rankings the relative importance <br />of city amenities do exist. Mr. Szafranski said these surveys would be helpful data. <br />Amber Greve asked when the full report would be available. Mr. Szafranski said there is <br />not an exact date: part of it will depend on when the new state fire behavior data comes <br />out. Amber continued that she was very interested in the role of grazers and prairie dogs <br />on wildfire mitigation. Dr. Matonis added that Boulder County land managers are <br />currently studying how to both retain native species and reduce wildfire risk. <br />Ryan Welch asked how sensitive these models are to the model inputs. Mr. Szafranski <br />replied that this is always useful to think about. <br />Helen asked whether there was some way for the City to share mitigation responsibility <br />at ditches with the ditch companies. She also asked about incentives for private <br />landowners who have fallow land to mitigate their land, including grants and incentives <br />for landowners to replace fences. Mr. Szafranski liked these ideas. Ember said that there <br />will be a section in the report for additional recommendations and opportunities for the <br />City that aren't strictly on open space/park land. Helen asked if the City going to feed this <br />plan into a larger conversation about fire preparedness that includes the role of the fire <br />department, coordination between communities, first responder emergency plans, <br />citizen alerting and managing traffic during evacuation. Adam explained that the City is <br />working in all of these areas and that this comprehensive approach is part of a bigger, on- <br />going review. <br />Laura pointed out that the mitigation efforts she had heard about (e.g. mowing, fences, <br />and firebreaks) could be effective for "normal" fires, but the citizens all know that the <br />10 <br />