My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 06 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2023 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 06 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2023 1:12:24 PM
Creation date
6/13/2023 10:57:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/8/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Public Comment: <br />Sherry Sommer, Resident of Louisville <br />Sommer asks about the fence along Davidson Mesa. She wonders if it would be <br />better to have some metal frames allowed so that it would not look so ugly. <br />Tina Fontillas, Resident of Louisville <br />Fontillas says she supports the proposed changes to the PUD. <br />Qian Wu, Resident of Louisville <br />Wu says regarding the fence along McCaslin that some owners are not building <br />a fence. Does that mean there will be areas without a fence along that road? <br />Closing Statement by Staff. <br />Ritchie comments on the grey color that will be used for the fence. <br />Brauneis asks if there are always requirements to build fences or is it not always <br />a requirement. <br />Ritchie says it is never a requirement to build one but all these current owners <br />have made it known that they would like to install a fence. It could take time to <br />build the fences as lots are still for sale but she cannot foresee there being any <br />gaps in fences once everyone has built. <br />Krantz asks how many lots are for sale <br />Ritchie says she thinks it is two to three. Along the Davidson Mesa side, the <br />homeowners do not desire a more traditional, chain link design. They would like <br />a wood or composite material, which is less combustible. <br />Brauneis asks where did welded wire as a material end up with this PUD. <br />Ritchie says that was not a discussion for this neighborhood. <br />Discussion by Commissioners: <br />Moline says he is in support of this. He appreciates the work from the <br />neighborhood to come together and create design guidelines. <br />Osterman also supports the resolution and it is in alignment with other similar <br />approvals. <br />Krantz appreciates the neighborhood coming together with each other and staff. <br />She is supportive of this. <br />Choi is in support of this proposal. <br />Brauneis agrees with his fellow commissioners comments. <br />Moline moves and Osterman seconds a motion to approve Resolution 9, 2023. <br />Motion passes unanimously by a roll call vote. <br />New Business — Public Hearing Items <br />A. Planned Unit Development Amendment — Cherrywood II — Adoption of <br />Resolution 11, Series 2023 recommending approval of a Planned Unit <br />Development Amendment to amend fence regulations for the Cherrywood <br />II subdivision. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.