My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 06 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2023 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 06 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2023 1:12:24 PM
Creation date
6/13/2023 10:57:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/8/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Applicant: City of Louisville <br />Case Planner: Lisa Ritchie, Planning Manager <br />All notice was met as required and there is no commissioner conflict of interest. <br />Staff Presentation: <br />Ritchie begins her presentation by saying that the Cherrywood II neighborhood's <br />PUD was approved in October of 1991. There are 85 single-family properties, <br />with 15 of those destroyed by the Marshall Fire. Currently, the PUD regulates <br />perimeter fences. This proposal before the commission was driven by the <br />neighborhood and HOA. <br />She mentions that this amendment is only for lots 48-64. For lots 48-62, the PUD <br />currently requires a 6' high cedar fence. The homeowners would like more <br />flexibility in the design materials, so anything permitted by city code. For lots 62- <br />64, the PUD currently requires a 42" California chain link fence. These <br />homeowners would prefer a 48" wrought iron -style fence. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Staff is recommending approval of Resolution 11 Series 2023, recommending <br />approval of the draft Resolution amending the Cherrywood II PUD fence <br />regulations. <br />Commissioner Questions of Staff. - <br />Krantz mentions that lots 48-54 houses did not seem damaged from the fire. <br />Was it just the fences that burned? <br />Ritchie says none of those homes or fences were destroyed by the fire. The <br />neighborhood would like the option though to have a non-combustible material. <br />Choi asks if there is a reason staff is not recommending a solid fence for lots 48- <br />64. <br />Ritchie says primarily the neighbors requested flexibility but staff does not look at <br />this space as the same as open space. It has minimal visibility from McCaslin as <br />well. <br />Public Comment: <br />Roger Wilkerson, Resident of Louisville <br />Wilkerson expresses his support for this proposal. Our neighborhood does have <br />an HOA and because of that, will help bring consistency and uniformity with the <br />fences. <br />Maria McClure, Resident of Louisville <br />McClure says this proposal makes sense for the neighborhood. This provides <br />the necessary flexibility but is also reasonable. <br />John Barrett, Resident of Louisville <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.