My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1021 LaFarge Ave History
PORTAL
>
HISTORICAL RECORDS (50.000)
>
ADDRESS HISTORIES
>
LaFarge Ave Address Histories
>
1021 LaFarge Ave History
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2023 8:58:18 AM
Creation date
6/14/2023 8:15:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Doc Type
Historical Records
Subdivision Name
Barclay Place
Property Address Number
1021
Property Address Street Name
Lafarge
Quality Check
9/21/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
card. The website gives 1920 as the date of construction of this house, but there does not <br />appear to be a basis for that date since the Assessor card is silent. <br />Boulder County has sometimes been found to be in error with respect to the date of <br />construction of Louisville buildings, so other evidence is looked to. In this case, the information <br />from the Di Francia family that E.J. Di Francia had built these three houses for three of his <br />daughters could not be true if the house was constructed in 1920, as he died in 1918. Also, he <br />had already purchased Lots 5-8, on which the three houses were built, by 1905. Most <br />significantly, the footprint of the house at 1021 La Farge is shown, along with those of the <br />houses at 1013 La Farge and 1045 La Farge, on the 1909 Drumm's Wall Map of Louisville. <br />Looking at the dates given by the County for the construction of the other two similar houses <br />on each side of 1021 La Farge, the County gives 1906 as the construction date of 1013 La Farge <br />and 1935 as the construction date of 1029 La Farge. For the same reasons given for why 1920 is <br />not a realistic construction date for 1021 La Farge, 1935 does not seem to be an accurate date <br />of construction for 1029 La Farge. However, "1906" is a plausible construction date for not only <br />1013 La Farge, but also 1021 and 1029 La Farge, particularly since Di Francia had purchased all <br />of these lots in 1905. <br />For these reasons, and in the absence of other information, the estimated date of construction <br />is presumed to be "circa 1906." It is worth noting that in 1906, there were already six daughters <br />in the family and the oldest Di Francia daughter was already 13 years old. It is possibly that the <br />1920 construction date given by the County for 1021 La Farge refers to the date of an addition <br />or remodel, which is what the County Assessor would have been concerned with in terms of <br />ascertaining the correct tax assessment. It is also possible that the 1920 construction date <br />represents the average between the actual or estimated construction date and a <br />remodel/addition date, a system that county assessor offices in Colorado are believed to have <br />at times followed. <br />Winifred Davis Ownership, 1927-1963 <br />In 1927, Winifred Davis (1882-1963) purchased 1021 La Farge from Maria Di Francia for herself <br />and her husband, Stephen "Steve" Davis. (It was not unusual for a married woman in Louisville <br />to take title to property instead of her husband, and family stories suggest that it was due to <br />the risk that her husband would be killed in a mine accident.) They were both from the county <br />of Glamorganshire, Wales and came to the U.S. in 1903. The 1910 federal census shows them to <br />be living in Louisville (but apparently renting a different home) by that time. He worked as a <br />coal miner. Directories indicate that by 1916, they were living at either 1013 or 1021 La Farge. <br />The 1920 census records also suggest, due to the proximity on the page of their names and <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.