My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1977 02 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1977 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1977 02 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:11 PM
Creation date
8/24/2009 12:38:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/1/1977
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1977 02 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />208 CONTINUED <br /> <br />all the time. <br />Councilman DiLorenzo stated that at the <br />208 seminar this was not what was said. <br />She stated that the governor will be the <br />one to appoint who will manage what area. <br />She stated that each basin will have its <br />own management for the first two years. <br />Update plans would have to be brought in <br />twic each year in those two years, and <br />this is how the overall management will <br />be picked out. <br />In the entire area there are 31 members <br />and there will be a representative from <br />each area on the Citizen Advisory Com- <br />mittee to DRCOG. <br />Councilman Caranci stated that he thought <br />the City had asked that the Coal Creek <br />basin be designated as the sixth basin. <br />Councilman DiLorenzo stated that it was <br />DRCOG;s recommendation that the Coal Creek <br />Basin be designated as the sixth basin. <br /> <br />Mr. Wurl stated that DRCOG has acknow- <br />ledged their support of the sixth basin, <br />but the problem they have is that each <br />basin will have a recommendation as to <br />who should be the management of that <br />basin when it goes to the governor. <br />Mr. Wurl stated that the problem with our <br />basin is that there will ultimately be <br />four entities involved and Boulder County <br />is suggesting that they be the management <br />agency. <br />Mr. Wurl stated that he felt that Coal <br />Creek Association should be the management <br />as the Association is already formed and <br />would be able to do a better job for the <br />basin; therefore, he is recommending to <br />Council that they support the recommendation <br />that Coal Creek Association be put in <br />charge of the management for the sixth <br />basin. <br />Councilman DiLorenzo stated that they used <br />the Coal Creek Basin as the example at <br />the seminar since it was a unique situation. <br />Mr. Wurl stated that these recommendations <br />are based on a premise that a sixth basin <br />is allowed. He stated that DRCOG will <br />make those recommendations and then there <br />is the final step that the governor must <br />agree with all the recommendations. <br />After discussion Councilman DiLorenzo <br />moved that Council take the following <br />action: <br /> <br />-9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.