My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Minutes 2009 05 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Minutes 2009 05 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:05:06 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 10:53:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />MAY 20, 2009 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Motion and Vote: <br />Loeblich moved and Weise seconded a motion to approve the resolution as presented <br />by staff in the Staff Report, with the modification to the signature block. <br />Roll Call Vote: <br /> <br />Erik Jasiak, associate Yes <br /> <br />Gunnar Malmquist excused <br /> <br />Horst Loeblich Yes <br /> <br />James Stuart Yes <br /> <br />John Weise Yes <br /> <br />Wayne Chancellor excused <br /> <br />Vacant position <br /> <br />Motion carried: 4 to 0 <br /> <br />The applicant and property owner, Karen Smith, approached the Board to ask what the <br />next steps were. Stuart deferred to staff to discuss the next steps. McCartney <br />explained that the applicant must either remove the deck in question or may be <br />permitted to reapply with another variance, that is substantially different from the <br />previous request. McCartney noted that the applicant would have until the next <br />th <br />application deadline in June (June 19) to apply for another variance. Otherwise the <br />deck must be removed. <br />Smith then inquired why there wasn’t an item on the agenda that was to discuss <br />amending the Louisville Municipal Code (LMC) regarding statutes of limitation on <br />building structures that have been in place for a number of years. Smith believes that <br />the LMC should be amended to allow for structures, which have been in place, the <br />ability to remain in place as long as the building department deems the structure was <br />built properly. <br />McCartney explained the item was not included on the agenda because the Board of <br />Adjustment is not the proper Board to discuss a change in the LMC. Requesting a code <br />change before the City Council is the proper procedure. If Council feels as though the <br />amendment is necessary, they will direct staff to initiate the amendment procedures, <br />which involves public hearings before Planning Commission and City Council. <br />Loeblich stated that he agreed with Smith the City Council should consider a change to <br />the LMC to consider statute of limitation. Jasiak agreed. Loeblich stated he would like <br />this included on the agenda for the May 26, 2009 study session regarding 2009 Goals <br />with City Council. McCartney restated that staff is not opposed to reviewing the statute <br />of limitation issue, but reiterated that the Board of Adjustment is not the appropriate <br />Board to be discussing policy change and that placing this item as a Goal for 2009 <br />would not be appropriate. McCartney recommended to Smith that she attend the June <br />2, 2009 City Council meeting and request this amendment during the public comments <br />portion of the hearing. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.